STATE OF M.P. Vs. PARVEZ KHAN
LAWS(SC)-2014-12-1
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA (FROM: MADHYA PRADESH)
Decided on December 01,2014

STATE OF M.P. Appellant
VERSUS
Parvez Khan Respondents





Cited Judgements :-

UNION TERRITORY, CHANDIGARH VS. PRADEEP KUMAR [LAWS(SC)-2018-1-5] [REFERRED TO]
IKTISAR ABDUL HAMEED ALI VS. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS [LAWS(RAJ)-2018-3-204] [REFERRED TO]
RAMRAJ MEENA VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(RAJ)-2016-12-144] [REFERRED TO]
TARA PRASAD SHARMA VS. STATE OF SIKKIM [LAWS(SIK)-2021-5-1] [REFERRED TO]
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT, JODHPUR VS. AKASHDEEP MORYA [LAWS(SC)-2021-9-141] [REFERRED TO]
VIJAY KUMAR SONKAR VS. UNION OF INDIA & ANOTHER [LAWS(MPH)-2018-7-515] [REFERRED TO]
VIJAY SINGH VS. STATE OF M.P. AND ORS. [LAWS(MPH)-2018-6-125] [REFERRED TO]
JAMMU & KASHMIR PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION VS. SHIKHA SHARMA (DR.) AND OTHERS [LAWS(J&K)-2017-2-53] [REFERRED TO]
ARVIND GURJAR VS. STATE OF M.P. AND ANOTHER [LAWS(MPH)-2016-10-55] [REFERRED TO]
RAJNEESH TIWARI VS. THE UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. [LAWS(MPH)-2016-12-2] [REFERRED TO]
M. ABDASSALAM AND OTHERS VS. STATE OF KERALA AND OTHERS [LAWS(KER)-2018-6-774] [REFERRED TO]
K. VENKATESAN VS. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE [LAWS(MAD)-2020-1-212] [REFERRED TO]
DEEPAK YADAV VS. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS [LAWS(ALL)-2020-1-477] [REFERRED TO]
GOVIND RAM PRAKASH SHARMA VS. HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH [LAWS(MPH)-2022-1-253] [REFERRED TO]
VIRENDRA JATAV VS. STATE OF M. P. [LAWS(MPH)-2022-4-152] [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH VS. ABHIJIT SINGH PAWAR [LAWS(SC)-2018-9-164] [REFERRED TO]
RIYASAT ALI VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2021-3-154] [REFERRED TO]
RAVINDRA KUMAR PANDORIYA VS. STATE OF M.P. [LAWS(MPH)-2020-1-314] [REFERRED TO]
RAVINDRA KUMAR PANDORIA VS. STATE OF M.P. AND OTHERS [LAWS(MPH)-2016-9-39] [REFERRED TO]
M.SANKAR VS. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE [LAWS(MAD)-2019-6-407] [REFERRED TO]
GENERAL MANAGER VS. RAMJAGDISH MEENA [LAWS(MPH)-2019-12-48] [REFERRED TO]
VIRENDRA JATAV VS. STATE OF M. P. [LAWS(MPH)-2020-8-376] [REFERRED TO]
SAMALA ANJANEYULU VS. STATE OF TELANGANA [LAWS(TLNG)-2019-10-14] [REFERRED TO]
AKASHDEEP MORYA S/O SH. LAXMAN DAS MORYA VS. RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT, JODHPUR THROUGH THE REGISTRAR GENERAL, RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT, JODHPUR [LAWS(RAJ)-2018-3-123] [REFERRED TO]
AKASHDEEP MORYA S/O SH. LAXMAN DAS MORYA VS. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN [LAWS(RAJ)-2018-5-223] [REFERRED TO]
K.MANIKANDAN VS. CHAIRMAN [LAWS(MAD)-2019-11-171] [REFERRED TO]
ROOP NARAYAN SAHU VS. STATE OF M.P. & OTHERS [LAWS(MPH)-2017-8-3] [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF KERALA VS. DURGADAS [LAWS(KER)-2023-9-201] [REFERRED TO]
RAHUL VS. UNION OF INDIA & ORS [LAWS(DLH)-2016-7-27] [REFERRED TO]
MUKESH KUMAR RAIGAR VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(RAJ)-2021-2-235] [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH VS. BHUPENDRA YADAV [LAWS(SC)-2023-9-51] [REFERRED TO]
NILESH JAT VS. STATE OF M.P. [LAWS(MPH)-2019-4-219] [REFERRED TO]
PAWAN VS. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & OTHERS [LAWS(MPH)-2018-9-6] [REFERRED TO]
P. PRAVEENKUMAR VS. STATE OF TAMIL NADU [LAWS(MAD)-2019-5-189] [REFERRED TO]
ASHUTOSH PAWAR VS. HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH [LAWS(MPH)-2018-1-74] [REFERRED TO]
SRI SOURABH DUTTA VS. STATE OF WEST BENGAL [LAWS(CAL)-2016-5-203] [REFERRED TO]
ANIL KUMAR BALMIK VS. STATE OF M.P. [LAWS(MPH)-2020-9-27] [REFERRED TO]
SANJAY CHOUHAN VS. STATE OF M.P. [LAWS(MPH)-2020-1-229] [REFERRED TO]
M ABDASSALAM VS. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY [LAWS(KER)-2018-6-106] [REFERRED TO]
NETAJIRAO SANJAY PRABHUDESSAI VS. STATE OF GOA [LAWS(BOM)-2021-1-94] [REFERRED TO]
RAJESH KUMAR VS. DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION [LAWS(DLH)-2015-9-377] [REFERRED TO]
PRASHANT KUMAR VS. GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. [LAWS(DLH)-2016-4-108] [REFERRED TO]
SURENDER SINGH VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(P&H)-2019-10-238] [REFERRED TO]
LOVEN SINGLA VS. PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT, CHANDIGARH [LAWS(P&H)-2019-10-228] [REFERRED TO]
SANJAY KUMAR SHARMA VS. STATE OF M P & ORS [LAWS(MPH)-2019-1-54] [REFERRED TO]
DEEPAK SINGH TOMAR VS. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. [LAWS(MPH)-2016-8-49] [REFERRED TO]
RAJVEER SHAKYA VS. THE STATE OF M.P. AND ORS. [LAWS(MPH)-2016-3-24] [REFERRED TO]
VINOD KUMAR TOMAR VS. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. [LAWS(MPH)-2015-9-110] [REFERRED TO]
NAGENDRA SINGH VS. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH [LAWS(MPH)-2018-1-17] [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF J&K AND ORS VS. HILAL AHMAD KHAN [LAWS(J&K)-2017-10-31] [REFERRED TO]
UNION TERRITORY, CHANDIGARH AND ORS. VS. PARDEEP KUMAR AND ORS. [LAWS(P&H)-2016-2-74] [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH VS. BUNTY [LAWS(SC)-2019-3-170] [REFERRED TO]
KARRA KRISHNA KUMAR VS. STATE OF TELANGANA [LAWS(TLNG)-2019-10-24] [REFERRED TO]
IYYAPPADOS VS. MEMBER SECRETARY TAMIL NADU UNIFORMED SERVICES RECRUITMENT BOARD [LAWS(MAD)-2019-6-424] [REFERRED TO]
J.SENTHIL VS. STATE OF TAMIL NADU [LAWS(MAD)-2019-2-288] [REFERRED TO]
P. BASKARAN VS. STATE OF TAMIL NADU [LAWS(MAD)-2020-1-310] [REFERRED TO]
SHRI MARIAPPAN VS. THE UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS [LAWS(CAL)-2016-12-92] [REFERRED TO]
KRIBHCO FERTILIZERS LIMITED VS. OSWAL CHEMICALS AND FERTILIZERS LTD [LAWS(ALL)-2019-8-360] [REFERRED TO]
DEVENDRAN VS. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, BEACH ROAD, CHENNAI [LAWS(MAD)-2018-3-648] [REFERRED TO]
M.NITHIYANANDAM VS. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE [LAWS(MAD)-2019-4-429] [REFERRED TO]
ANIL KUMAR PRADHAN VS. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH AND ORS. [LAWS(CHH)-2015-11-19] [REFERRED TO]
PARTHA SARATHI SINHA VS. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. [LAWS(CAL)-2015-8-11] [REFERRED TO]
IMTIYAZ AHMAD MALLA VS. STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR [LAWS(SC)-2023-2-77] [REFERRED TO]
SADASHIV KAKADIYA VS. STATE OF M.P. AND OTHERS [LAWS(MPH)-2018-8-325] [REFERRED TO]
ASI SANT RAM VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER [LAWS(P&H)-2016-11-176] [REFERRED TO]


JUDGEMENT

- (1.)Leave granted.
(2.)This appeal has been preferred against the Judgment and Order dated 20th March, 2012 of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Jabalpur in Writ Appeal No.262 of 2010.
(3.)The question raised for our consideration is whether the refusal by the competent authority to give compassionate appointment in police service on the ground of criminal antecedents of a candidate who is acquitted for want of evidence or who is discharged from the criminal case on account of compounding can be justified.


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.