COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE Vs. STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LTD
LAWS(SC)-2004-1-88
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Decided on January 28,2004

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE Appellant
VERSUS
STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LTD Respondents

JUDGEMENT

- (1.) THESE appeals can be disposed by this common judgment as they are against the judgments of the Tribunal dealing with the question whether the product of the respondents, namely, "pitch creosote mixture" is to be classified as "tar" or as "pitch".
(2.) IT must be mentioned that earlier to 1/3/1986 Tariff Item 11(5) read as follows: "11. Coal (excluding lignite) and coke all sorts, including calcined petroleum coke, asphalt, bitumen and tar- (5) Tar distilled from coal or lignite and other mineral tars, including partially distilled tars and blends of pitch with creosote oils or with other coal tar distillation products." It is thus to be seen that the tariff item included not only "tar" but also "blended pitch". That the respondents' product is covered by this item has been decided by this Court in the case of M.P. State Board Transport Corpn. v. CCE. Thus for the period from 1/9/1985 to 28/2/1986 the product would be covered as above and, as per the judgment of this Court, it would have the benefit of Notifications Nos. 121/62 dated 13-6-1962 and 75/84-CE dated 1/3/1984. However, with effect from 1/3/1986 the Central Excise Tariff Act was amended and the relevant amended tariff item reads as follows: JUDGEMENT_682_9_2004Html1.htm
(3.) THUS, now there are separate tariff items for "tar" and "pitch". The respondents sought to classify their product under Tariff Item 27.06 on the ground that it was "partially distilled tar". This contention was not accepted by the Assistant Collector who held that their product falls under Tariff Item 2708.11. The Commissioner (Appeals) dismissed the appeal of the respondents. However, the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal (CEGAT) has allowed the appeal of the respondents and held that their product falls under Tariff Item 27.06. The reasoning given by the Tribunal is as follows: "6. We are unable to accept this plea of the learned JDR on the ground that the tariff heading speaks of pitch obtained by blending with creosote oil or other coal tar distillates. The expression, blending envisages that the pitch must come into existence first and there should be another product, creosote oil or other coal tar distillates and both should be blended together to fall under Tariff Sub-Heading 2708.00. It is not disputed that the present product i.e. PCM is a result of partial distillation of tar and therefore, it is a partially distilled tar as admitted by the adjudicating authority referred to above. Therefore, in our view, the product falls under Tariff Item 2706.00." ;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.