JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) Special leave granted.
The appellant-company filed an application before the Employees' Insurance Court under Section 75 of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act') against the Employees' State Insurance Corporation (the 'Corporation') for a declaration that the demand of the Corporation of the employees' contribution and the employer's contribution on the payment made under the company's quarterly attendance bonus Scheme (the 'Bonus Scheme') was not valid. The Insurance Court allowed the said application and against that decision the Corporation preferred an appeal to the High Court. The learned single Judge reversed the decision of the Insurance Court holding that the attendance bonus was payable under the terms of the contract and, therefore, was "wages" within the meaning of Section 2(22) of the Act. In the Letters Patent Appeal preferred by the appellant, the Division Bench of the High Court confirmed the said decision. Hence the present appeal.
(2.) To appreciate the controversy between the parties, it is necessary to understand the salient features of the Bonus Scheme. The Bonus Scheme was a part of a settlement entered into between the appellant-employer and the union of the workmen in 1966. According to this Scheme which was introduced w.e.f. 1-7-1966, if a worker is present for all the working days during a quarter, he is entitled to attendance bonus equivalent to four days' wages. If he remains absent for one day in a quarter, he is to be paid attendance bonus equivalent to two days' wages for the first four quarters. If he is absent for two days in a quarter, he is entitled to attendance bonus equivalent to one day's wages in that quarter. If a worker is absent for more than two days during a quarter, he is not entitled to any attendance bonus in that quarter. For the purpose of attendance bonus, the quarters prescribed are April-June, July-September, October-December and January-March. If a worker is newly appointed in the middle of the quarter he is not entitled to attendance bonus for the relevant quarter. The attendance bonus is to be paid in the month following each year. For entitlement to the attendance bonus, further, casual leave or any kind of leave is to be treated as absence. Only privileged leave taken in a single quarter is to be treated as presence in that quarter.
For our purpose, what is necessary to note is that a settlement was arrived at in the course of the conciliation proceedings before the Conciliation Officer under Section 12 (3) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (the 'ID Act'). It was, therefore, binding on all parties to the dispute as well as the successors and assignees of the appellant and the subsequently employed workmen under Section 18(3) of that Act. The settlement could not be put an end to by any of the parties unilaterally. In other words, the Bonus Scheme had become an express contract of employment since the date of the settlement.
(3.) In the light of this legal status of the Bonus Scheme, we have to examine the relevant provisions of the present Act. Subsection (22) of Section 2 of the Act defines "wages" as follows
"2(22). "wages" means all remuneration paid or payable in cash to an employee, if the terms of the contract of employment, express or implied, were fulfilled and includes any payment to an employee in respect of any period of authorised leave, lock-out, strike which is not illegal or lay-off and other additional remuneration, if any, paid at intervals not exceeding two months, but does not include.
(a) any contribution paid by the employer to any pension fund or provident fund or under this Act;
(b) any travelling allowance or the value of any travelling concession;
(c) any sum paid to the person employed to defray special expenses entailed on him by the nature of his employment, or
(d) any gratuity payable on discharge;"
Sub-section (23) of Section 2 defines "wage period" in relation to an employee to mean the period in respect of which wages are ordinarily payable to him whether in terms of the contract of employment, express or implied or otherwise".
Section 39 of the Act deals with contributions to be paid by the employer and the employee. Section 40 provides for payment of contribution by the principal employer in the first instance. Relevant provisions of the said sections read as under:
"39. Contributions. - 1. The contribution payable under this Act in respect of an employee shall comprise contribution payable by the employer (hereinafter referred to as the employer's contribution) and contribution payable by the employee (hereinafter referred to as the employees' contribution) and shall be paid to the corporation.
2. The contributions shall be paid at such rates (as may be prescribed by the Central Government:
Provided that the rates so prescribed shall not be more than the rates which were in force immediately before the commencement of the Employees' State Insurance (Amendment) Act, 1989.
3. The wage period in relation to an employee shall be the unit in respect of which all contributions shall be payable under this Act.
4. The contributions payable in respect of each wage period shall ordinarily fall due on the last day of the wage period and where an employee is employed for part of the wage period is employed under two or more employers during the same wage period the contributions shall fall due on such days as may be specified in the regulations.
5.(a) If any contribution payable under this Act is not paid by the principal employer on the date on which such contribution has become due, he shall be liable to pay simple interest at the rate of twelve per cent, per annum or at such higher rate as may be specified in the regulations till the date of its actual payment:
Provided that higher interest specified in the regulations shall not exceed the lending rate of interest charged by any scheduled bank.
(b) Any interest recoverable under clause (a) may be recovered as an arrear of land revenue or under Section 45C to Section 45-I."
40. Principal employer to pay contribution in the first instance. - 1 The principal employer shall pay in respect of every employee, whether directly employed by him or by or through an immediate employer, both the employer's contribution and the employee's contribution.
2. Notwithstanding anything contained in any other enactment but subject to the provisions of this Act and the regulations, if any made thereunder, the principal employer shall in the case of an employee directly employed by him (not being an exempted employee), be entitled to recover from the employee the employee's contribution by deduction from his wages and not otherwise:
Provided that no such deduction shall be made from any wages other than such as relate to the period or part of the period in respect of which the contribution is payable, or in excess of the sum representing the employee's contribution for the period.";
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.