JUDGEMENT
J.C.SHAH, J. -
(1.) MESSRS Industrial Chemical Corporation-petitioners herein - set up a
business at Ghaziabad of manufacturing Nitrocellulose Thinners. On
December 2, 1959, the petitioners obtained from the Assistant Collector,
Central Excise, Meerut, a licence in Form L-6 under Rules 174 and 192 of
the Central Excise Rules, 1944, for the period ending December 31, 1959,
authorising them to obtain without payment of excise duty, power alcohol
and toluene to be used by them in the manufacture of Thinners. This
licence has been extended in favour of the petitioners by the Assistant
Collector year after year. In reply to an order for the supply of 100
gallons of power alcohol, placed by the petitioners with the Central
Distillery and Chemical Company Ltd., Meerut Cantt., a private distillery
engaged in the production of power alcohol, the officer-in-charge of the
distillery informed the petitioners that without a permit from the Excise
Commissioner, U.P., Allahabad, "the quantity of power alcohol demand
cannot be supplied, for power alcohol is for the purpose of the U.P.
Excise Act, IV of 1910, Denatured Spirit, and under the Rules framed
under the Indian Power Alcohol Act, denatured spirit may be given only
under a permit or licence issued by the Excise Commissioner."
(2.) THE petitioners then applied to the Excise Commissioner, U.P. praying that instructions be issued to the Central Distillery, Meerut, to issue
to the petitioners the quantity of power alcohol demanded by them. It was
claimed by the petitioners that the Central Government had control over
the manufacture and distribution of power alcohol, and the petitioners
having obtained a licence in Form L-6 for use of power alcohol for
industrial purposes, there was nothing in the U.P. Excise Act or Rules
made thereunder which authorised the Central Distillery, Meerut, or the
Excise Inspector to refuse to honour the demand. The Excise Commissioner
by his letter dated December 29, 1959, informed the petitioners that the
licence in From L-6 granted under the Central Excise Laws and Rules
merely exempted the petitioners from payment of excise duty and did not
authorise the petitioners to obtain power alcohol from a distillery in
Uttar Pradesh without a permit under the U.P. Excise Act, IV of 1910. The
petitioners' application to the State of U.P. praying that the order of
the Excise Commissioner be revised did not meet with success.
The petitioners then moved this Court under Article 32 of the Constitution for a writ of certiorari quashing the order passed by the
Excise Commissioner and the State of U.P. or a writ of mandamus
commanding them to act according to law. The petitioners claimed that on
the issue of a licence in From L-6 under the Central Excise Rules, they
acquired a right to obtain from any distillery power alcohol required by
them for their business without complying with the Rules regulating the
issue of excisable articles in operation in the State of Uttar Pradesh,
and by refusing to instruct the Central Distillery to Supply power
alcohol according to their demand, the Excise Commissioner and the State
of Uttar Pradesh infringed the fundamental right of the petitioners under
Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution. This contention is, for reasons to
be presently set out, wholly without substance. The relevant statutory
provisions and rules framed thereunder which have a bearing on the plea
raised by the petitioners may be briefly reviewed.
(3.) TO consolidate and amend the law relating to central duties of excise on goods manufactured or produced in certain parts of India and to salt,
the Central Legislature enacted the Central Excises and Salt Act I of
1944. By Section 2(d) of the Act the expression "excisable goods" means goods specified in the First Schedule as being subject to duty of excise
and includes salt. Item 4 in the First Schedule is 'Motor Spirit' which
includes Power alcohol, "that is to say, ethyl alcohol of any grade
(including such alcohol when denatured or otherwise treated), which by
itself or in admixture with any other substance, is suitable for use as
fuel for internal combustion engines". By Section 3 of the Act duty is
leviable in such manner as may be prescribed on all excisable goods other
than salt produced or manufactured in India. Section 6 authorises the
Central Government to provide that no person shall from such date as may
be specified in the notification issued in that behalf, except under the
authority and in accordance with the terms and conditions of a licence
granted under the Act, engage, among other activities, in the production
or manufacture or any process for the production or manufacture of any
specified goods included in the First Schedule or of any specified
component parts or ingredients of such goods. Section 37 invests the
Central Government with power to make rules to carry into effect the
purposes of the Act and in particular, amongst other purposes, to exempt
wholly or in part the duties imposed by the Act.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.