H H THE MAHARANA SAHIB SHRI BHAGWAT SINGH BAHADUR OF UDAIPUR Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
LAWS(SC)-1963-10-16
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA (FROM: RAJASTHAN)
Decided on October 03,1963

H.H.THE MAHARANA SINGH SHRI BHAGWAT SINGH BAHADUR OF UDAIPUR Appellant
VERSUS
STATE OF RAJASTHAN Respondents

JUDGEMENT

Shah, J. - (1.) By order of the President of India, H. H. the Maharana Sahib Shri Bhagwatsingh Bahadpur-hereinafter called the appellant'- was recognised as the Ruler of Udaipur with effect from July 4, 1955 in succession to his father the late Maharana Bhupal Singh.
(2.) A dispute arose between the appellant and his employees in the "Motor Garage department" about the conditions of the employment and representations were made by the latter to the Government of Rajasthan through the Motor Workers Mazdoor Union, Udaipur. The Government of the State of Rajasthan, on December 18, 1957 referred under S. 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 14 of 1947, the following dispute of the Industrial Tribunal, Rajasthan: "Whether the Maharana Sahib Bahadur of Udaipur is liable to pay of the staff working with him in the Palace Power. House and Motor Garage, consequent to their retrenchment, the arrears of claims or the due salary, leave wages, overtime wages and weekly holidays as per schedule appended hereto and if so, to what extent. If not, to what relief that staff is entitled to under the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, as the question of payment of these claims has arisen with the termination of their services due to retrenchment effected by the employers."
(3.) Two preliminary objections were raised before the Industrial Tribunal by the appellant against the maintainability of the reference 1. That the reference to the Industrial Tribunal for adjudication of the dispute was not maintainable without the previous sanction of the Central Government to the making of the reference. 2. That on the date when the reference was made no Industrial Tribunal was constituted under S. 7 A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 as amended by Act 36 of 1956, and on reconstitution of the Tribunal, the reference became incompetent. The Tribunal rejected both the objections and a writ petition filed by the appellant challenging the validity of the order of the Tribunal was dismissed by the High Court of Rajasthan. The appellant has appealed to this Court, with certificate granted by the High Court of Rajasthan.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.