JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) The present litigation exposits a sad sad scenario. It is sad
because a chaos has crept in in the lives of some students and it is
further sad as the State of Goa and its functionaries have allowed
ingress of systemic anarchy throwing propriety to the winds possibly
harbouring the attitude of utter indifference and nurturing an
incurable propensity to pave the path of deviancy. The context is
admission to Post Graduate courses in a single Government medical
college at Goa. The insensitivity of the authorities administering
medical college admissions was seriously decried by a three-Judge
Bench in Convenor, MBBS/BDS Selection Board and others v. Chandan Mishra and others, 1995 Supp3 SCC 77 and further echoed in Medical Council of India v. Madhu Singh and others, 2002 7 SCC 258. The Court in Chandan Mishra had
approvingly reproduced a sentence from the decision of the High Court
that proclaimed in sheer anguish: "Shakespeare in Othello has written
"Chaos is come again".
(2.) The saga of anguish continues with constant consistency. In
Asha v. Pt. B.D. Sharma University of Health Sciences and others, 2012 7 SCC 389 a
two-Judge Bench commenced the judgment thus: -
"Admission to the medical courses (MBBS and BDS) has
consistently been a subject of judicial scrutiny and review for
more than three decades. While this Court has enunciated the law
and put to rest the controversy arising in relation to one facet
of the admission and selection process to the medical courses,
because of the ingenuity of the authorities involved in this
process, even more complex and sophisticated sets of questions
have come up for consideration of the Court with the passage of
time. One can hardly find any infirmities, inaccuracies or
impracticalities in the prescribed scheme and notifications in
regard to the process of selection and grant of admission. It is
the arbitrary and colourable use of power and manipulation in
implementation of the schedule as well as the apparently
perverse handling of the process by the persons concerned or the
authorities involved, in collusion with the students or
otherwise, that have rendered the entire admission process
faulty and questionable before the courts. It is the admissions
granted arbitrarily, discriminately or in a manner repugnant to
the regulations dealing with the subject that have invited
judicial catechism. With the passage of time, the quantum of
this litigation has increased manifold."
(3.) We have begun with such a prefatory note and referred to
the aforesaid pronouncements as the facts, as have been
uncurtained, would shock one's conscience. A deliberate labyrinth
which not only assaults the majesty, sanctity and purity of law,
but also simultaneously creates a complex situation requiring this
Court to intervene in a different manner to redeem the situation as
far as possible so that there is some sanguine cathartic effect.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.