JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) The appellant in this appeal by Special Leave was tried and convicted
for offences punishable under Sections 302, 307, 427 read with Section 34
of the IPC and Section 3 of the Explosive Substances Act, 1908 read with
Section 34 of the IPC by the XXI Additional City Civil & Sessions Judge,
Bangalore. For the offence of murder punishable under Section 302 read with
Section 34 of the IPC the appellant was sentenced to undergo rigorous
imprisonment for life and a fine of Rs.5,000/-, in default of payment
whereof a further simple imprisonment for three months was awarded to the
appellant. Similarly, for the offence punishable under Section 307 read
with Section 34 IPC the appellant was sentenced to undergo five years'
rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs.1000/-. In default of payment of
fine the appellant was awarded a further simple imprisonment for a period
of one month. For the offence punishable under Section 427 read with
Section 34 IPC the appellant was awarded a sentence of one year's rigorous
imprisonment while a sentence of ten years' rigorous imprisonment and a
fine of Rs.2000/- was awarded to the appellant under Section 3 of the
Explosive Substances Act read with Section 34 of the IPC. Criminal Appeal
No.514/2000 filed by the appellant before the High Court against the
judgment and order of the trial Court having failed the appellant has filed
the present appeal to assail his conviction and the varying sentences
awarded to him, for different offences mentioned above.
(2.) Prosecution case in brief is that in furtherance of a common
intention to kill Muniraju (PW-14), Hanif (A-3) kept a tape recorder loaded
with an explosive substance (bomb) at what was known as "Friends Hair
Style" shop owned by Muniraju (PW-14) situated on the 6th Cross of
Someshwaranagar in Bangalore. When the tape recorder was switched on by the
deceased-Shankar, who was employed by Muniraju (PW-14) to work as a barber
in the shop, the bomb planted in the same exploded causing injuries to the
said Shankar that culminated in his death. Injuries were also caused to
Krishna (PW-1) and Shivaram (PW-7), two others similarly employed to work
in the shop. The use of the bomb, according to the prosecution, was with
the intention and knowledge and under circumstances that if by that act it
had caused the death of Krishna (PW-1) and Shivaram (PW-7) also the accused
would have been guilty of murder.
(3.) After completion of investigation and filing of chargesheet but
before committal of the case to the Sessions Court competent to try the
same the committal Court by its order dated 6th January, 1998 allowed an
application filed on behalf of Hanif (A-3) under Section 306 of the
Cr.P.C., granted pardon to him and treated him as an approver in the case.
A-3 was accordingly examined at the trial as an Approver. Briefly stated
the prosecution case and the genesis of the occurrence that led to the
killing of deceased-Shankar and injuries to Krishna and Shivaram was as
under:;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.