DEEP TRADING COMPANY Vs. INDIAN OIL CORPORATION
LAWS(SC)-2013-3-58
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA (FROM: ALLAHABAD)
Decided on March 22,2013

Deep Trading Company Appellant
VERSUS
INDIAN OIL CORPORATION Respondents

JUDGEMENT

- (1.) Leave granted.
(2.) The questions that arise for consideration in this appeal, by special leave are, whether respondent No. 1 has forfeited its right to appoint the arbitrator having not done so after the demand was made and till the appellant had moved the court under Section 11(6) and, if the answer is in the affirmative, whether the appointment of the arbitrator by respondent No. 1 in the course of the proceedings under Section 11(6) is of any legal consequence and the Chief Justice of the High Court ought to have exercised the jurisdiction and appointed an arbitrator
(3.) The above questions arise from these facts : On 01.11.1998, an agreement for kerosene/LDO dealership was entered into between the first respondent Indian Oil Corporation (for short, "the Corporation") and the appellant Deep Trading Company (for short, "the dealer") for the retail sales supply of kerosene and light diesel oil in the area specified in the schedule. In the course of dealership agreement allegedly some violations were committed by the dealer. Following the show cause notice dated 04.03.2004, the Corporation on 12.03.2004 suspended the sales and supplies of all the products to the dealer with immediate effect.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.