JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) Leave granted.
(2.) Whether final result of a case filed by a public servant with regard
to his service conditions is dependent on the arbitrary choice of the State
and/or its agencies/instrumentalities to prosecute the matter before the
higher Courts is one of the questions which would require consideration in
these appeals filed against order dated 16.10.2010 of the Division Bench of
the Delhi High Court whereby the writ petitions filed by the appellants
questioning the correctness of order dated September 12, 2008 passed by the
Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench (for short, 'the
Tribunal') were dismissed. The other question which calls for determination
is whether Non Practising Allowance (NPA) payable to the doctors employed
in Central Health Services, the Railways and other Departments of the
Government, who retired from service prior to 1.1.1996 is to be added to
their basic pay for calculation of pension payable to them.
(3.) The appellants are the doctors or the legal representatives of the
deceased doctors, who were employed in the Central Health Services,
Government of India or the Railways and were paid NPA as part of their
monthly pay in lieu of private practice, availability of less promotional
avenues and late entry in the service. Initially, NPA was paid at a fixed
rate commensurate with the rank of the doctors and their pay scale. The
same formula was adopted by successive Pay Commission. The 5th Pay
Commission revised the formula of calculating NPA and it was made 25% of
the basic pay of a Government doctor. The recommendations made by the 5th
Pay Commission on this issue are contained in para 52.16 of its report,
which is reproduced below:
"52.16. Non-practicing allowance
Non-practicing allowance is presently granted under a slab system with
amounts ranging from Rs. 600 per month at the lowest level to Rs. 1000
at the highest. It has been represented to us that prior to the Third
CPC, NPA was granted as a percentage of basic pay, ranging from 25 to
40% at different levels, working out to an average of about 27%, which
has, under the present arrangements dropped to as low as 12.5 to 16%.
Doctors are also aggrieved that it does not count forwards Housing
accommodation, though it is countable for all other purposes,
including pension. There are also related demands for extension of NPA
to other categories of professionals and Government servants who have
opportunities to earn in the open market, as also the demand for
discontinuance of NPA by permitting private practice. The Third CPC
observed that NPA was granted to doctors in lieu of private practice
on account of a traditionally enjoyed privilege as well as lesser
effective service and promotion prospects caused by late entry into
service. It did not favor private practice by doctors, and favored NPA
as a separate element from pay-scales. It suggested a switchover to a
slab system instead of the existing rates with monetary limits. The
Fourth CPC enhanced the rates under the different slabs, besides
granting it uniformly to all medical officers. The administrative
Ministry has suggested that NPA should be continued and also be
counted for purposes of housing accommodation eligibility. In the
matter of permitting limited private practice we have been advised by
expert opinion that it could be permitted in a limited form provided
malpractices could be curbed. We also note that it is only doctors who
are required to devote a lifetime to health care and life sustenance
under oath as a part of their qualifications. We do not recommend
extension of NPA to any other category. We recommended that the slab
system of granting NPA to doctors may be dispensed with and NPA be
granted at a uniform rate of 25% of basic pay subject to the condition
that pay plus NPA does not exceed Rs.29,500, i.e. less than the
maximum proposed for the Cabinet Secretary. It will continue to count
forwards all service and pensionary benefits as at present. No other
change is called for, as it would disturb relatives with other
services. We are also not in favour of permitting private practice in
any form at this stage.";
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.