JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) This appeal under Section 2(a) of the Supreme Court (Enlargement of
Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction) Act, 1970 assails a judgment and order
dated 8th February, 2011 passed by the High Court of Andhra Pradesh at
Hyderabad, whereby the High Court has partly allowed the acquittal appeal
filed by the State and while reversing the judgment and order passed by the
trial Court convicted the appellants for offences punishable under Section
302 read with Section 34 of the IPC and sentenced them to undergo
imprisonment for life besides levying a fine of Rs.1,000/- each. In
default of payment of fine the appellants have been sentenced to undergo
simple imprisonment for a period of one month each. The appellants have
been further convicted for an offence punishable under Section 324 read
with Section 34 of the IPC and sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for
three months each with the direction that the sentences shall run
concurrently.
(2.) Briefly stated the prosecution case is that on 27th April, 2003, at
around 7.00 p.m., the appellants along with one Papisetti Praveen who was
arrayed as accused no.4 stopped the deceased-Bezawada Srinivasa Rao and
PW.1-Alapati Seshadri while the latter were on their way home at Bethavolu
Park Centre - the place of occurrence. An altercation between the accused
persons on the one hand and the deceased and PW-1 on the other had
according to the prosecution taken place on the previous day i.e. on 26th
April, 2003, while the deceased and PW.1 were bringing some palmyrah nuts
from the fields. PW-3-Sonti Koteswara Rao, a shopkeeper who runs a pan shop
in the vicinity, claimed to be a witness to that incident and had
intervened and pacified the parties which passed off without any physical
harm to either side except that according to the prosecution appellant no.1-
Chinnam Kameswara Rao had threatened the deceased with dire consequences.
With the above incident in the background on 27th April, 2003, the accused
persons allegedly confronted the deceased and PW-1-Alapati Seshadri, armed
with stout casuarina sticks except accused no.4 who was unarmed. An
altercation followed between the two sides as a sequel to the incident of
the previous day in the course whereof appellant no.1-Chinnam Kameswara Rao
is alleged to have struck a blow on the head of the deceased. When PW-1-
Alapati Seshadri intervened, the remaining two appellants came down upon
him and gave stick blows on his head also. The injured, as also Alapati
Seshadri-PW-1 fell to the ground, whereupon A-4 is alleged to have kicked
and given fist blows to the deceased while A-1 to A-3 continued to
indiscriminately hit both of them with their sticks which caused bleeding
injuries to both the injured. Taking both of them as dead, the appellants
are alleged to have run away from the spot towards the house of appellant
no.1. Sonti Srinivasa Rao S/o Nageswara Rao (PW-2), Sonti Koteswara Rao (PW-
3), Sonti Srinivasa Rao, S/o Veeraiah (PW-4) and M.V. Gopala Krishna Murthy
(PW-6) are alleged to have witnessed the incident. PW-2-Sonti Srinivasa
Rao with the help of one P. Vasudeva Rao shifted both the injured to the
Government Hospital, Gudivada for treatment who informed the Gudivada Town
I Police Station about the arrival of the injured in the hospital whereupon
PW-9-B. Jaya Raju, ASI, reached the hospital and recorded the statement of
the deceased, marked Exhibit P-6. A case under Section 324 read with 34
IPC was on the basis of that statement registered and the injured shifted
to the University General Hospital, Vijaywada for further treatment. Around
2.50 a.m. on 28th April, 2003, the deceased succumbed to his injuries in
the hospital at Vijayawada whereupon the Investigating Officer altered the
offence from Section 324 read with Section 34 IPC to Section 302 read with
Section 34 IPC.
(3.) After completion of investigation that included the arrest of the
accused persons, post mortem of the dead body of the deceased, seizure of
the weapons of offence, the police filed a charge sheet against the
appellants for offences punishable under Sections 302 and 307 IPC while A-4
was charged under Sections 302 and 307 read with Section 34 IPC.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.