JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) These appeals are directed against judgments dated 28.2.2008 and
4.2.2010 of the Full Bench and the Division Bench respectively of the
Madras High Court whereby the appellant's challenge to the order of the
learned Single Judge was negatived and his dismissal from service was
upheld.
(2.) The appellant joined service under the Tamil Nadu Public Service
Commission (for short, 'the Commission') as Junior Assistant w.e.f.
1.9.1973. While he was posted in 'P' Section of the Commission, which deals
with the appointment of Invigilators and Chief Invigilators for various
examinations, the Commission issued Notification dated 8.8.1989 for holding
competitive examination for direct recruitment of Assistant Surgeons. The
main written examination was conducted on 17.2.1990 and 18.2.1990. Shri
Syed Abdul Kareem, who was appointed as Chief Invigilator at Bharathiar
Government Arts College for Women, North Madras, examination centre, met
the Superintendent of Section 'P' on 15.2.1990 and requested him to appoint
some other person as Chief Invigilator by saying that he was suffering from
heart ailment. When the Superintendent expressed his inability to accede
to his request, Shri Sayed Abdul Kareem asked for the list of persons who
were to assist him. Thereupon, he was given a list of 19 persons. Some of
the persons named in the list informed the Chief Invigilator on telephone
that they were unable to assist him. Therefore, he again contacted the
Superintendent of 'P' Section for appointment of substitute Invigilators.
The Superintendent then asked the appellant to post five persons to assist
the Chief Invigilator. The latter supplied the list of five persons
including S/Shri Asir (School Assistant), Khader Baig (Officer Assistant)
and R. Mahalingam to Syed Abdul Kareem to work as substitute Invigilators.
(3.) In the examination held on 17.2.1990, some (six) question papers of
the afternoon examination were found mixed up with the morning question
papers. When the students pointed out this discrepancy, the Chief
Invigilator immediately instructed to take back the question papers of the
afternoon examination and issue the question papers meant for morning
examination. This incident was reported in the newspapers. The Commission
took serious view of the matter and on the basis of preliminary
investigation done by the concerned officers, departmental proceedings were
initiated against the appellant under Rule 17(b) of the Tamil Nadu Civil
Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules (for short, 'the
Rules') on the following charges:
"(1) That Thiru. A.Savariar, Assistant, 'P' Section who was in
charge of appointment of Chief Invigilators and Invigilators for
the conduct of Main Written Examination relating to the post of
Assistant Surgeon in the Tamil Nadu Medical Service for the year
1989-90 had served appointment order to Thiru. R. Mahalingam,
who was on leave, to act as an Invigilator at Bharathiar Arts
College for Women, Madras without obtaining the orders of the
Officer in charge of the Section.
(2) That, he has unauthorisedly issued orders of appointment
as Invigilator to one Thiru Asir, School Assistant, Government
Training School, Madras for Assistant Surgeon examination held
on 17.02.1990 and 18.02.1990 at Bharathiar Arts College for
Women, North Madras though his name was not included in the list
furnished by the Collector of Madras.
(3) That, he deputed by orally instructing Thiru. Khader Baig,
Office Assistant of Commission's Office to the Examination hall
unauthorisedly.
(4) That, he has produced in the Court while filing a petition
for anticipatory bail the office note requiring him and certain
other staff to attend office on 17.02.1990 without the knowledge
of the office. It is highly irregular to produce an official
record in the Court without the sanction of the competent
authority.
(5) That, he unauthorisedly went to the examination hall
without any reason or orders by neglecting his office work for
which he obtained permission to work on the holiday (i.e.,
17.02.1990).
(6) That, he has arrogated to himself the powers of an officer
and has functioned in a highhanded manner."
;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.