JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) This writ petition, under Article 32 of the Constitution of India,
has been filed to issue specific directions to effectuate meaningful
implementation of the judgments rendered by this Court in Union of India vs. Association for Democratic Reforms and Another, 2002 5 SCC 294 and
People s Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL) and Another vs. Union of India & Anr., 2003 4 SCC 399 and also to direct the respondents herein to make it
compulsory for the Returning Officers to ensure that the affidavits filed
by the contestants are complete in all respects and to reject the
affidavits having blank particulars.
Background:
(2.) In order to maintain purity of elections and to bring transparency in
the process of election, this Court, in Association for Democratic Reforms
, directed the Election Commission of India-Respondent No. 1 herein
to issue necessary orders, in exercise of its power under Article 324 of
the Constitution, to call for information on affidavit from each candidate
seeking election to the Parliament or a State Legislature as a necessary
part of his nomination paper furnishing therein information relating to his
conviction/acquittal/discharge in any criminal offence in the past, any
case pending against him of any offence punishable with imprisonment for 2
years or more, information regarding assets (movable, immovable, bank
balance etc.) of the candidate as well as of his/her spouse and that of
dependants, liability, if any, and the educational qualification of the
candidate.
(3.) Pursuant to the above order, the Election Commission, vide order
dated 28.06.2002, issued certain directions to the candidates to furnish
full and complete information in the form of an affidavit, duly sworn
before a Magistrate of the First Class, with regard to the matters
specified in Association for Democratic Reforms . It was also
directed that non-furnishing of the affidavit by any candidate or
furnishing of any wrong or incomplete information or suppression of any
material information will result in the rejection of the nomination paper,
apart from inviting penal consequences under the Indian Penal Code, 1860.
It was further clarified that only such information shall be considered to
be wrong or incomplete or suppression of material information which is
found to be a defect of substantial character by the Returning Officer in
the summary inquiry conducted by him at the time of scrutiny of nomination
papers.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.