JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) 'Care or cure', is the clue for the resolution of the lis arising in
these cases. If the product by name 'Moisturex' is held to be a medicament
for cure, the decision goes in favour of the assessee and if the product is
held to be one for care of the skin, the decision benefits the Central
Excise. The Tribunal has held in favour of the assessee and, thus, the
Central Excise is in appeals.
(2.) The Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as
'CETA') under Chapter 30 of the Schedule (2) deals with pharmaceutical
products for the purposes of tariff. At the relevant time, if a product is
held to be medicament, then, the rate of duty was 15% and, if not, 70%.
Heading 30.03 deals with the medicaments including veterinary medicaments.
The same reads as follows:
JUDGEMENT_544_TLPRE0_2013_1.html
(3.) 'Medicaments' is defined under Note 2(i) under Chapter 30 which reads
as follows:
"2. For the purposes of heading No. 30.03:
(i) 'Medicaments' means goods (other than foods or beverages such as
dietetic, diabetic or fortified foods, tonic beverages) not
falling within heading No.30.02 or 30.04 which are either:-
(a) products comprising two or more constituents which have
been mixed or compounded together for therapeutic or
prophylactic uses; or
(b) unmixed products suitable for such uses put up in measured
doses or in packings for retail sale or for use in
hospitals."
;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.