JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) The legislature of Uttar Pradesh enacted the U.P. Industrial Area
Development Act, 1976 (hereinafter referred to as "the 1976 Act") for
planned development of industrial and residential areas in the State. For
achieving that object, the State Government constituted New Okhla
Industrial Development Authority ("NOIDA"). Thereafter, a new township was
established near the capital of the country. Unfortunately, allotment of
land and plots in the new township have become subject matter of
innumerable controversies and generated huge litigation in the Allahabad
and Delhi High Courts and this Court.
(2.) NOIDA Entrepreneurs Association filed the above noted writ petition
under Article 32 of the Constitution by way of public interest litigation
(PIL) for enforcement of their rights guaranteed under Articles 14, 19 and
21 of the Constitution. It pleaded that the very object of creating NOIDA
has been defeated because of major land scandals and prayed that a thorough
probe be ordered into the allotment of land and plots and the abuse of
power by the functionaries of NOIDA.
(3.) On 7.4.1997, this Court gave liberty to the petitioner to file
amended writ petition and to place before the Court facts on the basis of
which the writ petition could be treated as a PIL. In furtherance of that
order, the petitioner filed amended petition. Thereafter, the Court issued
notice dated 21.4.1997 on following two issues:
"(1) Issue writ of mandamus and/or any appropriate writ and direct CBI
to investigate into all the land allotments and conversion of lands
made by NOIDA during the past 10 years.
(2) Issue an appropriate writ and directions and frame guidelines for
allotment of lands by NOIDA.";
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.