JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) In this appeal, by special leave, appellant - Sushil Sharma ("the
appellant") has challenged judgment and order dated 19/02/2007 passed by
the Delhi High Court in Criminal Appeal No.827 of 2003 confirming the death
sentence awarded to him in Sessions Case No.88 of 1996. He was tried in
the said case along with A2-Keshav Kumar ("A2-Keshav"), A3-Jai Prakash, A4-
Rishi Raj and A5-Ram Prakash.
(2.) The appellant was tried for offences punishable under Section 302,
Section 120-B read with Sections 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code ("the
IPC"). A2-Keshav was tried under Section 120-B read with Sections 302 and
201 of the IPC. A3-Jai Prakash, A4-Rishi Raj and A5-Ram Prakash were tried
under Section 212 of the IPC. Learned Additional Sessions Judge by
judgment and order dated 3/11/2003 convicted the appellant under Section
302 of the IPC. He convicted the appellant and A2-Keshav under Section
120-B read with Section 201 of the IPC. Since the charge under Section 302
read with Section 120-B of the IPC was held not proved against A2-Keshav,
he was acquitted of the said charge. Charge under Section 212 of the IPC
was held not proved against A3-Jai Prakash, A4-Rishi Raj and A5-Ram Prakash
and they were acquitted. Learned Additional Sessions Judge forwarded the
death reference to the Delhi High Court, as required under Section 366 of
the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ('the Cr.P.C.'). A2-Keshav did not
file any appeal. As stated above, by the impugned judgment, the Delhi High
Court confirmed the death sentence awarded to the appellant.
PROSECUTION CASE:
(3.) The appellant was the President of Delhi Youth Congress (I), at the
relevant time. Naina Sahni ('the deceased') was the General Secretary of
the Delhi Youth Congress (I) Girls Wing. The appellant and the deceased
were working for Delhi Youth Congress. The office of the Delhi Youth
Congress was earlier situated at 4, Bhai Veer Singh Marg, Gole Market, New
Delhi. Later on, it was shifted to 2, Talkatora Road, New Delhi. The
deceased used to visit the appellant at the office of Youth Congress at the
above-mentioned places. In the year 1992, the appellant obtained Flat
No.8/2A situated at Mandir Marg, New Delhi ("Flat No.8/2A" or "the said
flat") from it's allottee - Jagdish Prasad. The deceased used to visit the
appellant at the said flat also. At times, she used to stay there in the
night. The appellant and the deceased got married secretly. The deceased,
therefore, continued to live in the said flat as the wife of the appellant
till she was murdered.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.