JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) Heard the learned counsel for the parties.
(2.) We have seen Notification No. 65 of 1987 dated 1-3-1987. In our view the interpretation given by the Tribunal cannot be sustained. The impugned order must be and is, therefore, set aside.
(3.) Under this notification terry towelling was exempted. However, the terry-towelling fabric was not exempted. The respondents have paid duty on the exempted item i. e. on towels but duty has not been paid on the fabric. As the notification does not exempt fabrics, duty has to be paid on the fabric under Sub-Heading 5802.12. We, however, direct that the respondent will be given adjustment for the duty paid on the towels. If on calculation of duty, it is found that a higher amount has been paid than what is due on the fabric, then the claim for refund will be allowed. If on the other hand it is found that some duty has still to be paid then the respondent shall pay the duty.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.