STATE OF U P Vs. U P SALES TAX OFFICERS GRADE II ASSOCIATION
LAWS(SC)-2003-4-14
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Decided on April 16,2003

STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH Appellant
VERSUS
U.P. SALES TAX OFFICERS GRADE II ASSOCIATION Respondents

JUDGEMENT

D.M.Dharmadhikari, J. - (1.) THE State of Uttar Pradesh is in appeal against the judgment of the Division Bench of Allahabad High Court dated 30.11.1998, whereby the Sales Tax Officers, Grade-II (now re-designated as Trade Tax Officer, Grade-II and hereinafter referred to as 'Trade Tax Officers') have been directed to be fixed in the revised pay scale of Rs. 690-1,420 with consequential further revision of pay in accordance with the pay revision recommended by Second U. P. Pay Commission.
(2.) THE claim of Trade Tax Officers through their association (respondent herein) in the High Court was that at par with other District Level Officers in the State services who are carrying pre-revised pay scale of Rs. 400-750, the Trade Tax Officers should also have been given revised pay scale of Rs. 690-1,420 in implementation of the Government resolution dated 29.12.1981 which was taken pursuant to the report of the Second U. P. Pay Commission set up for revision of pay scales of Government servants w.e.f. 1.7.1979. THE High Court, after going through the relevant part of the report of the Pay Commission and the Government resolution dated 29.12.1981, taken pursuant thereto, came to the conclusion that since the Trade Tax Officers were carrying pre-revised pay scale of Rs. 400-750 at par with other District Level Officers in other departments of the State, the pay scale of Rs. 625-1,240 granted to them which is a step below the revised pay scale of Rs. 690-1,420 given to the District Level Officers in other departments, is per se discriminatory. It is held that keeping in view the nature of the duties and functions of Trade Tax Officers they are equal in rank to District Level Officers and have to be given revision of pay scales at par with other District Level Officers as both of them were carrying the same pre-revised pay scale of Rs. 400-750. The learned counsel appearing for the State of Uttar Pradesh, in assailing the judgment of the High Court, has contended that the report of the second U. P. Pay Commission deals with the pay revision of Sales Tax or Trade Tax Officers of the Sales Tax Department distinctly under Chapter XX under the heading 'Institutional Finance'. It is pointed out that the case of pay revision of District Level Officers in various departments, other than Tax Department, have been separately dealt with by the Pay Commission in its report. It is, therefore, submitted that no parity is found status-wise and functionally between Trade Tax Officers in the Tax Department and District Level Officers in other departments of the State. It is submitted that by resolution dated 29.12.1981, the Government has fixed pay scales for different posts a step above the pay scale recommended by the Pay Commission. In doing so on reasonable grounds, a separate treatment has been given by making a distinction between officers in Tax Department and District Level Officers in other departments, amongst whom are those involved in developmental activities. Looking to the nature of onerous duties of District Level Officers engaged in developmental activities of the State, the Government in its resolution have granted them pay scale of Rs. 690-1,420 and Trade Tax Officers have been given revised scale of Rs. 625-1,240 although prior to the above revision both Trade Tax Officers and District Level Officers were carrying pre-revised scale of Rs. 400-750. It is contended that pay fixation is a subject for experts who undertake comparative study of nature of duties and functions of various employees to be considered for pay revision. Such a decision of the Pay Commission and the Government decision based thereon is not open to judicial review.
(3.) LEARNED counsel appearing for the respondent (Association of Trade Tax Officers herein) in supporting the impugned judgment has tried to project point of view different from the one accepted by the High Court. It is pointed out that the officers who were carrying pay scale of Rs. 400-750 under the first Pay Commission were recommended pay scale of Rs. 625-1,170 by the Second Pay Commission w.e.f. 1.7.1979. After considering the report and recommendations of the Second Pay Commission, the Government passed resolution on 29.12.1981 to grant pay scale of Rs. 625-1,240 that is a step above the pay scale recommended by the Second Pay Commission. The learned counsel then took us through the relevant parts of the report of the Second Pay Commission and the Government resolution taken consequent thereupon. It is pointed out that the Pay Commission separately dealt with the Trade Tax Officers in the tax department and District Level Officers in other departments. So far as District Level Officers are concerned, after identifying them and ascertaining their nature of duties and functions, the Pay Commission classified them in two groups, i.e., A and B. In group A are included officers who are engaged in developmental activities and for them because of onerous duties, pay scale of Rs. 850-1,720 was recommended. For the other officers' in group B, in which are included officers not engaged in developmental activities but are discharging traditional duties, pay scale of Rs. 700-1,600 was recommended even though both categories of officers in group A and B were carrying various different pre-revised pay scales of Rs. 400-750 ; Rs. 450-850 ; Rs. 450-950 and Rs. 550-1,200 depending upon the department to which they belonged.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.