R B DIWAN BADRI DASS Vs. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL PUNJAB PATIALA
LAWS(SC)-1962-9-16
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA (FROM: PUNJAB & HARYANA)
Decided on September 07,1962

R.B.DIWAN BADRI DASS Appellant
VERSUS
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL,PUNJAB,PATIALA Respondents

JUDGEMENT

- (1.) This appeal by special leave arises out of an industrial dispute in relation to a comparatively minor demand made against the appellants by the respondents-their employees; but in challenging the validity of the award passed by the Industrial Tribunal in favour of the respondents on that demand the learned Solicitor-General has raised a general question before us. He contends that in granting the demand made by the respondents, the award has illegitimately and unjustifiably trespassed on the appellants' freedom of contract. The appellants as employers, are entitled to fix the terms of employment on which they would be willing to employ workmen and it is open to the workmen either to accept those terms or not; industrial adjudication should not interfere in such a matter. That is the nature of the general contention which has been raised before us in the present appeal.
(2.) The facts leading to the dispute are few and they lie within a very narrow compass. The appellants are the Trustees of the Tribune Press and Paper and the Trust is being worked in accordance with the terms of the will executed by Dya1 Singh Majithia on the June 15, 1895. In carrying out the policy of the Trust, the five appellants have executed a Power-of-Attorney in favour of Mr. R. P. Sharma and the Press in managed and the Paper is conducted to carry out the policy laid down by the will.
(3.) It appears that before the 1st of July, 1956, for the purpose of leave, the appellants had divided their employees into two categories (1) the Lino-operators and (2) the rest of the workmen in the Press Section; and Rule 57 made provision for leave on the basis of the said classification. The effect of the said rule was that no press worker other than the lino operator was entitled to any kind of paid leave although he was given the right to claim 30 days' wages plus dearness allowance payable in January every year if he had worked for 11 months. In addition, the said press worker was entitled to quarantine leave on the terms mentioned in R. 53.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.