KALYAN PEOPLES CO OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED Vs. DULHANBIBI AQUAL AMINSAHEB PATIL
LAWS(SC)-1962-4-4
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA (FROM: BOMBAY)
Decided on April 23,1962

KALYAN PEOPLES CO OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED Appellant
VERSUS
DULHANBIBI AQUAL AMINSAHEB PATIL Respondents

JUDGEMENT

Das Gupta, J. - (1.) Disputes having arisen between the appellant, a Co-operative Bank and one Amin Saheb Patil, who had taken loans from the Bank and Kutubuddin Mohemad Ajim Kazi, who had stood surety in respect of the loans they were referred to arbitration in two references under S. 54 of the Bombay Co-operative Societies Act, 1925. The Board of Arbitrators originally consisted of Mr. L. V. Phadke, Mr. G. K. Phadke and Mr. Trilokekar. After the Board had several meetings and recorded some evidence Mr. Trilokekar, who was the nominee of the borrower, Amin Saheb, retired. Thereafter the Board was re-constituted with Mr. Kotwal as the new nominee of the borrower. This Board also recorded some evidence but after sometime Mr. Kotwal also retired. There was a fresh constitution of the Board with the other two members as before and Mr. M. D. Thakur as the nominee of the borrower. Further evidence was recorded by the Board thus constituted and finally the Board gave its awards in the matters on March 14, 1955
(2.) Dissatisfied with these awards Amin Saheb filed two revision applications before the Bombay Co-operative Tribunal. Apart form certain objections on the merits of the awards a preliminary objection was taken before the Tribunal as regards the legality of the awards on the ground that the Board as last constituted had acted on evidence not recorded before it. The Tribunal accepted this preliminary objection, set aside the awards and remanded the cases to the Assistant Registrar for a re-hearing.
(3.) Shortly after this Amin Saheb died but his heirs and legal representatives made two applications to the Bombay High Court under Art. 227 of the Constitution against the Tribunal's decision. The High Court held that the Tribunal had erred in thinking that the Board of Arbitrators had acted illegally in acting on the evidence recorded by the previous Boards when this was done with the full knowledge of the parties and without any objection on either side. Accordingly, they set aside the orders passed by the Tribunal and restored the awards made by the Board of Arbitrators.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.