JUDGEMENT
Ayyangar, J. -
(1.) By a communication dated April 5, 1930, from the Secretary to the Government of the Central Provinces addressed to the Commissioner, Jabalpur Division, certain Nazul land was made available to the Municipal Committee of Jabalpur. In this letter the Secretary stated:
"I am directed by the Governor in Council with the previous sanction of the Government of India to communicate the following orders of the Government of the Central Provinces:-
Under Section 38 (1) (f) of the Central Provinces Municipalities Act, 1922, Government is pleased to transfer to the Municipal Committee, Jabbulpore, free of premium and ground rent nazul land measuring.......... of the Jubbulpore town. The land shall vest in the Municipal Committee subject to the following conditions:
(1) The land shall be used only for the purpose of a garden and no part of it shall be used for any other purpose without the previous sanction of the Local Government.
(2) If condition 1 is broken the land shall be liable to be divested under section 38 (2) and resumed by Government and no compensation whatsoever shall be payable to the Municipal Committee upon such resumption.
(3) If the land is resumed by Government for any Government purpose, the provisions of Section 38 (3) will apply."
Sub-sections (2) and (3) of s. 38 referred to ran:
"38. (2) The State Government may, by notification, direct that any property which has vested in the committee shall cease to be so vested, and thereupon the property specified in the notification shall cease to be so vested and the State Government may pass such orders as it thinks fit regarding the disposal and management of such property.
(3) Where any unmovable property is transferred, otherwise than by sale, by the State Government to a committee, for public purposes, it shall be deemed to be a condition of such transfer, unless specially provided to the contrary, that, should the property be at any time resumed by the Government, the compensation payable therefor shall, notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (I of 1894), in no case exceed the amount, if any, paid to the Government for the transfer, together with the cost or the present value, whichever shall be less, of any buildings erected or other works executed on the land by the committee."
(2.) The land thus obtained was being used by the Municipal Committee in accordance with the condition of the transfer as a public garden.
(3.) The Central Provinces and Berar Municipalities Act, 1922 was repealed by the City of Jabalpur Corporation Act, 1948 (Madhya Pradesh Act III of 1950.) Under this later enactment the Municipal Committee was substituted by the Jabalpur Corporation, the appellant before us and all properties-movable and immovable - which were previously vested in the Municipal Committee were transferred to and vested in the Corporation (vide S. 71 of the Jabalpur Corporation Act), and by reason of the vesting, the appellant was in enjoyment of the transferred property.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.