JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) By this order we are disposing of the prayer made by the
appellants for appointment of a group of independent persons to
assist the Court in monitoring the investigation being carried
out by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), the
Enforcement Directorate and the Income Tax Department in '2G
case'.
(2.) The writ petition filed by the appellants before the Delhi
High Court for ordering an investigation by the CBI or a Special
Investigation Team into what was termed as '2G Spectrum Scam'
for unearthing the role of respondent no. 5 Shri A. Raja, the
then Union Minister, Department of Telecommunications, senior
officers of the department, middlemen, businessmen and others
was dismissed by the Delhi High Court vide order dated
25.5.2010.
(3.) The appellants challenged the order of the Delhi High
Court in SLP(C) No. 24873/2010. By a detailed order dated
16.12.2010, this Court granted leave and issued the following
directions:
"(i) CBI shall conduct thorough investigation into
various issues highlighted in the report of the
Central Vigilance Commission, which was forwarded
to the Director, CBI vide letter dated 12-10-2009
and the report of the CAG, who have prima facie
found serious irregularities in the grant of
licences to 122 applicants, majority of whom are
said to be ineligible, the blatant violation of the
terms and conditions of licences and huge loss to
the public exchequer running into several thousand
crores. CBI should also probe how licences were
granted to large number of ineligible applicants
and who was responsible for the same and why TRAI
and DoT did not take action against those licensees
who sold their stakes/equities for many thousand
crores and also against those who failed to fulfil
rollout obligations and comply with other
conditions of licence.
(ii) CBI shall conduct the investigation without
being influenced by any functionary, agency or
instrumentality of the State and irrespective of
the position, rank or status of the person to be
investigated/probed.
(iii) CBI shall, if it has already not registered
first information report in the context of the
alleged irregularities committed in the grant of
licences from 2001 to 2006-2007, now register a
case and conduct thorough investigation with
particular emphasis on the loss caused to the
public exchequer and corresponding gain to the
licensees/service providers and also on the issue
of allowing use of dual/alternate technology by
some service providers even before the decision was
made public vide press release dated 19-10-2007.
(iv) CBI shall also make investigation into the
allegation of grant of huge loans by the public
sector and other banks to some of the companies
which have succeeded in obtaining licences in 2008
and find out whether the officers of DoT were
signatories to the loan agreement executed by the
private companies and if so, why and with whose
permission they did so.
(v) The Directorate of Enforcement/agencies
concerned of the Income Tax Department shall
continue their investigation without any hindrance
or interference by anyone.
(vi) Both the agencies i.e. CBI and the Directorate
of Enforcement shall share information with each
other and ensure that the investigation is not
hampered in any manner whatsoever.
(vii) The Director General, Income Tax
(Investigation) shall, after completion of analysis
of the transcripts of the recording made pursuant
to the approval accorded by the Home Secretary,
Government of India, hand over the same to CBI to
facilitate further investigation into the FIR
already registered or which may be registered
hereinafter."
;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.