JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) Leave granted.
(2.) Following international competitive bidding procedures,
the Appellant had invited bids for the supply and
installation of Steam Generator package for captive coal-based Thermal Power Projects in different areas. The bid of
the Respondent No.1 was rejected by the Appellant by its
letter dated 5
th
January, 2011, as the same did not meet the
minimum qualifying requirements set out in the Bid
documents. Furthermore, the Qualified Steam Generator
Manufacturer, Ansaldo Caldaie, Italy, proposed by the said
Respondent, did not have the necessary minimum
qualification, as was required in terms of the Bid
documents.
(3.) The main issue which arises for consideration in this
Appeal is whether Ansaldo Caldaie, Italy, can be said to be
a Qualified Steam Generator Manufacturer within the
definition set out in the detailed Invitation for Bids. The
said invitation for bid contained the qualifying requirement
for Bidders in Clause 7 of the Tender Document. Clause 7.1.0
provided that the Bidder should meet the qualifying
requirements of any one of the qualifying routes stipulated
under Clause 1.1.0 or 1.2.0 or 1.3.0 or 1.4.0 or 1.5.0. In
addition, the Bidder was also required to meet therequirements stipulated under Clause 7.6.0 and 7.7.0,
together with the requirements stipulated under Section ITB.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.