JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) A Bench of the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore vide
its judgment dated 19
th December, 2003 while rejecting all the
contentions raised by the accused Nagesh, confirmed the
judgment of conviction and order of sentence passed by the trial
court vide its judgment dated 18
th
January, 2000 convicting the
accused for an offence under Section 302 of the Indian Penal
Code, 1860 (IPC) and sentencing him to undergo imprisonment
for life and pay a fine of Rs.2000/- in default to undergo further
rigorous imprisonment for six months. Aggrieved from the
judgment of the High Court, the accused has preferred the
present appeal.
(2.) We may, at the very outset, briefly refer to the facts as per
the case of the prosecution. The deceased, Smt. Nagaratna,
was a student of second year Pre-University College (PUC) at the
relevant time. Her parents, namely Smt. Sumitra, PW4 and
Shivarai Shetti, PW9, had six daughters. PW9 was running a
small tea shop at Gokarna. The deceased was earlier staying
with her parents. The accused No.1, Anant, was a close relative
of Nagaratna and was unmarried at the relevant time. Accused
No.1 also was the resident of Gokarna but at that time was
residing at Belgaum. The other two accused, namely, Venketesh,
Accused No.1 and Nagesh, Accused No.3, were brothers-in-law of
Anant. All of them were residents of village Gokarna. Anant had
pressed upon the parents of Nagaratna for sending her to
Belgaum with him. During the Ganapathi festival, she had
visited her parents at Gokarna and was very reluctant to go back
to Belgaum. However, Anant again persuaded her parents to
send her to Belgaum promising them to secure her a good job at
Belgaum. Her parents, thus, had sent her back with him to
Belgaum. Hence, at the relevant time, she was staying with
Anant at Belgaum.
(3.) PW1, Smt. Roopa, is the owner of the building called 'Sai
Prasad', bearing No.304/31 and CCB No. 18 situated at Shastri
Nagar, Goodshed Road, Belgaum comprising of three blocks.
She herself was staying in one of the blocks with her husband
and children while Anant was staying in the second block along
with the deceased, Nagaratna. Chotubhai, PW2, was also
residing in the upstairs portion of the same block. In other
words, PW1 and PW2, both were the immediate neighbours of
Anant.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.