STATE OF KERALA Vs. MAR APPRAEM KURI CO. LTD
LAWS(SC)-2012-5-36
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA (FROM: KERALA)
Decided on May 08,2012

STATE OF KERALA Appellant
VERSUS
MAR APPRAEM KURI CO. LTD Respondents

JUDGEMENT

- (1.) Introduction By order dated 18.02.2009 in Civil Appeal No. 6660 of 2005 in the case of State of Kerala v. M/s. Mar Appraem Kuri Co. Ltd., the referring Bench of 3-judges of this Court doubted the correctness of the view taken by a 3-judges Bench of this Court in Pt. Rishikesh and Another v. Salma Begum, 1995 4 SCC 718. Accordingly, the matter has come to the Constitution Bench to decide with certitude the following core issues of constitutional importance under Article 254(1) of the Constitution. Scope of the Reference when does repugnancy arise?
(2.) In the present case, the question to be answered is - whether the Kerala Chitties Act 23 of 1975 became repugnant to the Central Chit Funds Act, 40 of 1982 under Article 254(1) upon making of the Central Chit Funds Act 40 of 1982 (i.e. on 19.08.1982 when the President gave his assent) or whether the Kerala Chitties Act 23 of 1975 would become repugnant to the Central Chit Funds Act 40 of 1982 as and when notification under Section 1(3) of the Central Chit Funds Act 40 of 1982 bringing the Central Act into force in the State of Kerala is issued?
(3.) The question arose before the Full Bench of the Allahabad High Court in the case of Smt. Chandra Rani and others v. Vikram Singh and others, 1979 AllLJ 401in the following circumstances:- The U.P. Civil Laws (Reforms and Amendment) Act 57 of 1976 being the State Act stood enacted on 13.12.1976; it received the assent of the President on 30.12.1976; it was published in the Gazette on 31.12.1976 and brought into force w.e.f. 1.01.1977 whereas the Civil Procedure Code (Amendment) Act 104 of 1976, being the Central Act, was enacted on 9.09.1976; it received the assent of the President on the same day; it got published in the Central Gazette on 10.09.1976; and brought into force w.e.f. 1.02.1977 (i.e. after the State Act came into force). The Full Bench of the Allahabad High Court in Chandra Rani held that the U.P. Act No. 57 of 1976 was a later Act than the Central Act No. 104 of 1976. The crucial date in the case of the said two enactments would be the dates when they received the assent of the President, which in the case of the Central Act was 9.09.1976 while in the case of the U.P. Act was 30.12.1976. This decision of the Full Bench of the Allahabad High Court in the case of Chandra Rani came for consideration before this Court in Pt. Rishikesh .;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.