JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) Introduction
By order dated 18.02.2009 in Civil Appeal No. 6660 of
2005 in the case of State of Kerala v. M/s. Mar Appraem Kuri
Co. Ltd., the referring Bench of 3-judges of this Court doubted
the correctness of the view taken by a 3-judges Bench of this
Court in Pt. Rishikesh and Another v. Salma Begum, 1995 4 SCC 718. Accordingly, the matter has come to the
Constitution Bench to decide with certitude the following core
issues of constitutional importance under Article 254(1) of the
Constitution.
Scope of the Reference when does repugnancy arise?
(2.) In the present case, the question to be answered is -
whether the Kerala Chitties Act 23 of 1975 became repugnant
to the Central Chit Funds Act, 40 of 1982 under Article 254(1)
upon making of the Central Chit Funds Act 40 of 1982 (i.e. on
19.08.1982 when the President gave his assent) or whether the
Kerala Chitties Act 23 of 1975 would become repugnant to the
Central Chit Funds Act 40 of 1982 as and when notification
under Section 1(3) of the Central Chit Funds Act 40 of 1982
bringing the Central Act into force in the State of Kerala is
issued?
(3.) The question arose before the Full Bench of the
Allahabad High Court in the case of Smt. Chandra Rani and others v. Vikram Singh and others, 1979 AllLJ 401in
the following circumstances:- The U.P. Civil Laws (Reforms
and Amendment) Act 57 of 1976 being the State Act stood
enacted on 13.12.1976; it received the assent of the President
on 30.12.1976; it was published in the Gazette on 31.12.1976
and brought into force w.e.f. 1.01.1977 whereas the Civil
Procedure Code (Amendment) Act 104 of 1976, being the
Central Act, was enacted on 9.09.1976; it received the assent
of the President on the same day; it got published in the
Central Gazette on 10.09.1976; and brought into force w.e.f.
1.02.1977 (i.e. after the State Act came into force). The Full
Bench of the Allahabad High Court in Chandra Rani
held that the U.P. Act No. 57 of 1976 was a later Act than the
Central Act No. 104 of 1976. The crucial date in the case of
the said two enactments would be the dates when they
received the assent of the President, which in the case of the
Central Act was 9.09.1976 while in the case of the U.P. Act
was 30.12.1976. This decision of the Full Bench of the
Allahabad High Court in the case of Chandra Rani
came for consideration before this Court in Pt. Rishikesh
.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.