JUDGEMENT
K. Vinod Chandran, J. -
(1.) A History-sheeter erased from the records of the police
as also the face of the earth in a homicide. The accused
herein were arraigned as accused 1 and 2 before the Sessions
Court on charges of having caused the death of one Eli Mani
@ Vijayan. The charge was that after rendering him
unconscious by intoxication Accused 1 and 2 delivered 4 to 5
blows on him, with the blunt portion of MO5 weapon
( ), in furtherance of their common intention to cause
his death and then caused disappearance of evidence by
removing the blood stains and throwing away the weapon
used for the commission of the crime. The accused were
charged under Sections 302 and 201 read with Section 34 of
Indian Penal Code. On committal made by the Judicial First
Class Magistrate, Kolencherry, the accused stood trial before
the 5th Additional Sessions Court, Ernakulam, which court
after considering the entire evidence, acquitted the first
accused, affording him the benefit of reasonable doubt and the
second accused for a complete lack of acceptable evidence
against him. The State is in appeal before us, challenging that
the appreciation of evidence by the trial court was perverse and
that the Sessions Court has not considered the convincing
evidence corroborated by the material circumstances. The trial
court has detailed the facts leading to the charge and has
considered the circumstances relied on by the prosecution; and
we do not deem it necessary to repeat it in appeal.
(2.) The investigation was set in motion with the discovery
of an unidentified body lying in a canal by name Kumbalappilly,
near Kattachira Bund at Kokkappillikkara. The First
Information Report was registered on the information supplied
by PW1, an Advocate and the ward member of the Panchayat.
In the morning of 7.1.2001 PW1 was informed of a person
having been found lying dead in the canal, coming within the
panchayat ward of which he is a member. PW1 having
proceeded to the site, confirmed the fact and immediately gave
First Information Statement before the Sub Inspector of Police,
Puthencruz, PW15. On the basis of Ext.P1 FI statement, Ext.P1
(a) FIR was registered by PW15 as suspicious death, since at
that point of time the cause of death and the identity of the
person were not clear. PW15 immediately proceeded to the
site and conducted inquest of the body and prepared Ext.P2
inquest report. The body was found in the canal near an
unnumbered concrete store room situated in the bank of the
canal; used for storing the planks of the check-dam in the canal.
Body was found immersed in water; in the canal. On taking out
the body; as per the identification made by the local people, it
was identified as that of Vijayan @ Eli Mani S/o. Mathai aged
around 40 years. The body on examination was found to
contain three open wounds on the head and two open wounds
on the face. A sword which was lying inside the water adjacent
to the dead body was also recovered as per the inquest report.
This sword was subsequently revealed to be that of the
deceased and is not the weapon which caused the injuries.
(3.) The investigation was taken over by the Circle
Inspector of Police, PW16 and Ext.P15 report dated 8.1.2001
was filed seeking deletion of the caption "suspicious death" and
addition of Section 302 IPC in Ext.P1(a) FIR. The appellants
were arrested on 7.2.2001 and Ext.P18 report was filed before
the JFCM Court seeking arraignment of the appellants as
accused in Crime No.6 of 2001 under Sections 302 and 201
read with Section 34 IPC. The Court then framed charges on
the basis of final report and conducted trial in which 16
witnesses were examined for the prosecution and Ext.P1 to P24
were proved as exhibits; and MOs 1 to 15 were marked as
material objects, for the prosecution. The appellants entered a
defence of total denial and marked Exts.D1 to D3 case diary
contradictions and two documents as D4 and D5. The
prosecution case as projected in trial was that the first accused
due to previous animosity towards the deceased, along with
the second accused, a friend, committed the murder of the
deceased in furtherance of their common intention and threw
his body into the canal and attempted to efface evidence by
washing away the blood stains in the concrete store room and
by throwing away the weapon used for commission of the
offence.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.