JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) This appeal, at the instance of accused No.1 is directed against the
judgment of the Division Bench of the Madras High Court dated 12.12.2008 in
Criminal Appeal 1089 of 2001 by which the High Court while confirming the
conviction and sentence imposed on appellant-accused No.1 (A-1), set aside
the conviction and sentence as against accused-6 (A-6) and acquitted him of
the charges.
(2.) The case of the prosecution as projected before the Court below was
that Murugesan (PW-1) and Sankar (deceased) were brothers and were native
of a place called Sooriyur. As is the practice in their village, in the
month of Markazhi (Tamil month), there used to be a game called Manju
Virattu also called as Jalli Kattu in which bulls brought from other
villages would be confined in an enclosure and then the bulls would be
allowed to run, throwing a challenge to the youngsters to tame them and
whosoever controls such bulls, used to get a reward in the function. It is
stated that on 09.01.2000 which was in the Tamil month of Markazhi, the
bull belonging to the appellant, who belonged to the place called
Thiruvalarchipatti participated in the function. The deceased stated to
have controlled the said bull and the appellant was stated to have been
aggrieved by the so-called heroism of the deceased which resulted in
alleged threat to the deceased. Twelve days prior to the murder of the
deceased, six persons including the appellant stated to have quarreled and
also assaulted the deceased which, according to PW-1 was reported by the
deceased to him (PW-1). PW-1 appeared to have consoled the deceased by
stating that they can report the conduct of the appellant and others to the
local Panchayat. On 04.02.2000 at 10.30 a.m., when the deceased along with
PW-1 was waiting at the bus stand which place was known as Manthai, the
appellant and other accused chased the deceased and caught hold of the
deceased at Mamundi temple. While the appellant inflicted cut injuries in
the left arm of the deceased with the weapon called aruval, the other
accused stated to have inflicted certain other injuries on the head, leg
and the buttocks of the deceased. On sustaining the injuries, the deceased
stated to have fallen down. He was carried by PW-1 to his residence and
from there, after arranging taxi from nearby town called Thiruvaramboor
shifted him to Trichy Government Hospital around 01.30 p.m. The deceased
was examined by Dr. Saminathan (PW-8) to whom the deceased informed that he
was assaulted by six known persons. However, it is stated that the
deceased did not survive and breathed his last around 2 p.m. Based on the
information given by PW-1, a case was registered by sub-Inspector Ethiraj
(PW-9) as crime No.20/2000 in the Navalpattu Police Station for offences
under Sections 147, 148, 341 and 302, Indian Penal Code (for short IPC').
Inspector Kailasanathan (PW-12) stated to have simultaneously gone to the
place of occurrence. He prepared the observation Mahazar in the presence
of witnesses and also prepared a model sketch Exhibit P-6. The statements
of witnesses were also recorded by him and then he went to the Government
hospital, Trichy and prepared an inquest report Exhibit P-18. He also
stated to have examined other witnesses including PW-1. The body of the
deceased was sent for post mortem on the same day. On 05.02.2000, he
enquired other witnesses and on 06.02.2000 at 4 p.m. Sakthivel (A-6) was
arrested and based on the admissible portion of his statement five aruvals
were stated to have been recovered from the thorn bush at 5.30 p.m. near a
place called Koonavayil adjacent to Sulingu which were recovered in the
presence of witnesses under Exhibit P-20. The post mortem was conducted by
Dr. Karthikeyan (PW-11) and the post mortem certificate was marked as
Exhibit P-15. The post mortem report disclosed as many as five injuries
and the doctor opined that the deceased appeared to have died of shock and
hemorrhage due to injury Nos.4 and 5.
(3.) All the accused were tried before the trial Court wherein the
prosecution examined PWs-1 to 12, marked Exhibit P-1 to 20 and M.O.s 1 to
10. While M.O. 1 to 5 were the weapons, namely, aruval, M.O.6 was blood
stained polyester lungi, M.O.-7 was blood stained Kasi towel, M.O.8 was
blood stained sand, M.O.-9 was unstained sand and M.O.-10 was yellow and
blue colour mixed lungi seized from the deceased.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.