JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) The only point for consideration here is, whether or not
the Division Bench of the Madhya Pradesh High Court was justified
in declaring Clause (d), Article 45 of Schedule 1-A of the Indian
Stamp Act, 1899 (for short, '1899 Act') which was brought in by the
Indian Stamp (Madhya Pradesh Amendment) Act, 2002 (for short,
'M.P. 2002 Act') as unconstitutional being violative of Article 14 of
the Constitution of India.
(2.) The above point arises in this way. Two writ petitions
came to be filed before the Madhya Pradesh High Court. In both writ
petitions initially it was prayed that Clauses (f) and (f-1), Article 48,
Schedule 1-A brought in the 1899 Act by Section 3 of the Indian
Stamp (Madhya Pradesh Amendment) Act, 1997 (for short, 'M.P.
1997 Act') be declared ultra vires. During the pendency of these
petitions, the 1899 Act as applicable to Madhya Pradesh was further
amended by the M.P. 2002 Act. The respondents, referred to as writ
petitioners, amended their writ petitions and prayed that Clause (d),
Article 45 of Schedule 1-A of the 1899 Act as substituted by M.P.
2002 Act be declared ultra vires. The writ petitioners set up the case
that original Article 48 of the 1899 Act, Schedule 1-A prescribed
stamp duty payable at Rs. 10/- if attorney was appointed for a single
transaction. By M.P. 1997 Act, Article 48 Clause (f) was substituted
by Clauses (f) and (f-1). Clause (f-1) provided that where power of
attorney was executed without consideration in favour of person who
is not his or her spouse or children or mother or father and
authorizes him to sell or transfer any immovable property, the stamp
duty would be leviable as if the transaction is conveyance under
Article 23. Explanation II inserted by M.P. 1997 Act provided that
where under Clauses (f) and (f-1), duty had been paid on the power
of attorney and a conveyance relating to that property was executed
in pursuance of power of attorney between the executant of the
power of attorney and the person in whose favour it was executed,
the duty on conveyance should be the duty calculated on the market
value of the property reduced by duty paid on the power of attorney.
By M.P. 2002 Act, stamp duty relating to power of attorney has been
prescribed in Article 45 of Schedule 1-A. Clause (d) thereof
prescribes stamp duty at two per cent on the market value of the
property which is subject matter of power of attorney when power of
attorney is given without consideration to a person other than father,
mother, wife or husband, son or daughter, brother or sister in relation
to the executant and authorizing such person to sell immovable
property situated in Madhya Pradesh. The writ petitioners pleaded,
inter alia, that the distinction between an agent who was a blood
relation and who was an outsider carved out in Article 45, Clause (d)
was legally impermissible. The provision violates Article 14 of the
Constitution as it has sought to create unreasonable classification.
(3.) The State of Madhya Pradesh stoutly defended the
challenge to the above provisions and stated before the High Court
that the matter of rate of stamp duty was solely in the domain of
State Legislature and none of the provisions of the Constitution was
offended by the above provisions.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.