BUDHURAM Vs. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
LAWS(SC)-2012-9-46
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA (FROM: CHHATTISGARH)
Decided on September 20,2012

BUDHURAM Appellant
VERSUS
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Respondents

JUDGEMENT

- (1.) The appellant who has been convicted under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to undergo the imprisonment for life by the learned trial court seeks to challenge the order of affirmation passed by the High Court of Chhattisgarh by means of the present appeal.
(2.) The relevant facts, in brief, may be noted at the outset: According to the prosecution, on 1.8.1998 the accused-appellant had attacked his wife Shantibai in his own house with the backside of an axe resulting in her death. In the next morning, PW 2 (Ramchandra) informed PW 5 (Bandhanram), who was the Sarpanch of the village, that the wife of the accused was not to be found. Thereafter, along with some other persons PW 2 and PW 5 had inquired from the accused-appellant the whereabouts of his wife. According to the prosecution, initially, the accused had disclosed that his wife had gone to her sister s place but subsequently, on insistence, the accused disclosed that he had committed the murder of his wife by attacking her with an axe and that he had thrown the dead body in the Dhawraghat Nala. It is the further case of the prosecution that the accused took PW 2, PW 5 and the other persons to the place where he had thrown the dead body and that the same was recovered from the spot pointed out by the accused. Thereafter, PW 2 lodged the report of the incident in the Police Station at Kamleshwarpur at 9.00 PM on 2.8.1998, on receipt of which a case was registered and investigation was undertaken by PW 4 (Ranjit Ekka), Sub-Inspector of Police. In the course of investigation, the police visited the house of the accused and seized therefrom the broken bangles of the deceased, plain soil and bloodstained earth as well as some blood stained clothes of the deceased. Furthermore, on the basis of the statement made by the accused, the police recovered an axe from the house of the accused and also a T-shirt belonging to the accused which was also bloodstained. The dead body was sent for post-mortem examination which confirmed injuries on the front side of the head caused by a blunt weapon. The recovered articles were also sent for chemical examination, the report of which confirmed the presence of human blood.
(3.) On the basis of the aforesaid materials the accused was tried for the offence of murder and was found guilty by the learned trial court. The aforesaid conviction and sentence has been affirmed in appeal by the High Court. Aggrieved, the appellant has instituted the present appeal.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.