JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) The present appeals are directed against the judgment dated
26
th March, 2009 passed by the High Court of Bombay, Nagpur
Bench affirming the conviction of the accused under Sections
376(2)(f), 377 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereafter
IPC ) and the sentence of death awarded to the accused-appellant
1herein vide judgment of the First Additional Sessions Judge,
Amrawati, dated 10
th
September, 2008.
(2.) The facts giving rise to the present appeal fall within a narrow
compass and are as follows :
Mahendra Namdeorao Wasnik, PW12, was living with his wife,
three children and parents in Village Asra. He used to go to Village
Tarkheda for earning his livelihood at the thresher of one Zafarbhai.
Normally, he used to return to his village at about 10.00 p.m. after
doing his day s work. On 2
nd March, 2007, he left his house at 7.00
a.m. and returned from his work at about 9.00 p.m. Upon his
arrival, he was informed by his wife Kantabai Wasnik that at about
4.00 p.m. one person, whose name she did not know, had come to
the house and after taking tea, he left. The said person had again
come at about 6.30 p.m. On his second visit, he told that he would
take out their daughter, namely Vandana, to get her biscuits. After
talking to the mother of Vandana, the accused had taken Vandana
for purchasing biscuits but never brought her back to her house.
Having learnt this, PW12 started searching for his daughter
Vandana along with others, but they were unable to find her. On
23
rd March, 2007 at about 8.00 a.m. when he was going to the Police
Station for lodging the report, he saw that some persons had
gathered in the fields of Pramod Vitthalrao Mohod. He went there
and saw the dead body of his daughter in that field. The dead body
of Vandana was lying in a nude condition and there were injuries
on her person. It has come in evidence that the accused had visited
the house of PW12, Mahendra Namdeorao Wasnik to see his ailing
father. He left after a cup of tea. It was on this information
received from his wife that PW12 suspected that the accused was
the person who was a resident of Village Parlam and had taken
away his daughter. Consequently, PW12 lodged the report with the
Police, Exhibit 71 in respect of the incident. As the body of the
deceased minor girl, Vandana, had been recovered, an FIR was
registered being Crime Case No.23/2007 under Sections 376(2)(f),
377 and 302 IPC. The Investigating Officer started the investigation,
prepared the inquest panchnama in respect of the dead body of the
deceased Vandana vide Exhibit 11. Sample of soil, soil mixed with
urine and clothes of the deceased Vandana were seized from the
spot under Panchanama Exhibit 12. The Investigating Officer had
also drawn a sketch map of the spot of the incident on 16
th
June,
2007 vide Exhibit 64. At the request of the Police, the Judicial
Magistrate recorded statement of the witnesses, namely, Bhimrao
Gulhane, Nilesh Gedam, Ravindra Borkar and Sumit Ramteke
under Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
(hereafter Cr.P.C. ) The accused was arrested on 10
th
April, 2007
his clothes were seized vide Exhibit 14. He was subjected to
medical examination. The doctor had taken blood and semen
sample of the accused. These samples and the viscera were sent for
medical examination vide Exhibits 21 and 22. The reports thereof
are Exhibits 76 to 79.
(3.) The accused was produced before the Court and was
committed to the Court of Sessions where he was charged with the
offences punishable under Sections 376(2)(f), 377 and 320 IPC. He
was tried for these offences. Learned Trial Court found him guilty
of all the offences and awarded him punishments as follows :
Offences Punishment/Sentence 302 IPC Sentenced to death and he shall be hanged
by neck till he is dead subject to confirmation by the Hon ble High Court, Bombay, Bench at Nagpur as per the
provisions of Section 366 of Cr.P.C. 376(2)(f) IPC Sentenced to imprisonment for life and to
4pay fine of Rs.1,000 (one thousand), in default to suffer rigorous imprisonment for six months.
377 IPC Sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for 10
(ten) years and to pay fine of Rs.1,000 (one
thousand) in default to suffer further
rigorous imprisonment for six months.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.