JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) Leave granted.
(2.) This appeal has been preferred against the
judgment and order dated 8th July, 2010 passed by the
High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in
Civil Revision No.5081 of 2003 whereby the revision
filed by the appellant has been dismissed by the
High Court.
(3.) The appellant-landlady filed a petition under
Section 13 of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction
Act, 1949 before the Rent Controller, Chandigarh,
seeking ejectment of the respondent-tenant from 229,
Industrial Area, Phase-I, Chandigarh, (hereinafter
referred to as the demised premises). It was stated
in the eviction petition that the demised premises
was required by the appellant for herself as well as
her husband and son. The Rent Controller allowed the
petition for ejectment on the ground of bona fide
personal requirement and directed the respondenttenant to hand over the vacant possession of the
demised premises to the appellant-landlady within a
period of three months from the date of the order.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.