KRUSHNAKANT B PARMAR Vs. UNION OF INDIA
LAWS(SC)-2012-2-31
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA (FROM: GUJARAT)
Decided on February 15,2012

KRUSHNAKANT B.PARMAR Appellant
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA Respondents

JUDGEMENT

- (1.) Leave granted.
(2.) The appellant, who was working as Security Assistant, was proceeded departmentally on 2nd September, 1996 for the following charge: "While functioning as SA(G) in the office of Deputy Central Intelligence Officer, Palanpur, under Subsidiary Intelligence Bureau, Ahmedabad, unauthorisedly absented from duty between 3.10.1995 and 7.11.1995, 9.11.1995 and 10.12.1995 and from 10.12.1995 to 2.8.1996, thereby violating Rule 3(1)(ii) 3(1)(iii) of Central Civil Services (Conduct) Rules, 1964."
(3.) On receipt of charge-sheet the appellant denied the allegation by his reply dated 7th October, 1996 and also alleged bias against his Controlling Officer, Mr. P. Venkateswarlu with specific stand that he was prevented by him from signing the attendance register and to attend the office. He also explained reasons of absence for certain period for which he had applied for leave.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.