JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) Leave granted.
(2.) This appeal by special leave arises out of a judgment and order dated
30th August, 2010 passed by the High Court of Calcutta whereby Criminal
Appeal No.5 of 2010 filed by the appellant assailing his conviction under
Section 302 of the IPC and sentence of life imprisonment with a fine of
Rs.50,000/- and a default sentence of rigorous imprisonment for two years
has been dismissed.
(3.) Two policemen deployed on patrol duty examined at the trial as PWs 1
& 3 reached Chatham Jetty at about 23.50 hrs. on the 19th of March, 2008.
While at the Jetty they started smelling diesel odour and suspecting that
something fishy was going on, parked their motor cycle to take a walk in
the surrounding area. Soon they noticed that two dinghies were tied to
M.V. Pillokunji, a vehicle ferry boat stationed at the jetty. In one of
these dinghies there were 20 drums besides a man present on the dinghy
while in the other there were three to four men and 14 drums, which were
being filled with diesel using a plastic pipeline drawn from the vessel
mentioned above. The suspects jumped in to one of the two dinghies and
escaped, when they saw the approaching policemen that included Head
Constable Sunil Kumar (PW-2) and Constable K.Vijay Rao (PW-5). The police
party, it appears, tried to contact police station Chatham and the Control
Room. While they were doing so the Engineer, Master and the Laskar of the
said vessel attempted to snatch the VHF set from them. The police party,
therefore, caught hold of these persons as they appeared to be in league
with the miscreants, who had escaped. Soon thereafter arrived Constable
Amit Talukdar (PW-4) and the deceased Head Constable Shri Shaji from Police
Station, Chatham. After hearing the version from the patrolling constables
and the PCR van personnel who too had arrived on the spot the deceased
informed the SHO, Chatham police station and requested him to reach the
spot. In the meantime, the deceased and PW-1 boarded the dinghy that had
been left behind by the miscreants leaving the three crew members of the
vessel under the vigil of the remaining members of the police party. PW-1
who accompanied the deceased on to the dinghy firmly tied the rope of the
dinghy but while both of them were still in the dinghy, the other dinghy
that had earlier fled away returned to the spot with four persons on board.
The prosecution case is that the appellant and one Abdul Gaffar were among
those who entered the dinghy and got into a scuffle with the deceased to
secure the release of the dinghy. In the course of the scuffle the
appellant is alleged to have picked up a dao (sharp edged weapon lying in
the dinghy) and inflicted an injury on the head of the deceased. The
appellant is then alleged to have pushed the deceased into the sea. The
rope of the dinghy was cut by the miscreants to escape in the dinghy
towards Bambooflat.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.