JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) The present appeal is directed against the judgment of the High Court
of Uttarakhand at Nainital dated 7th April, 2008 passed in Criminal Appeal
No. 757 of 2001.
(2.) We may notice the facts giving rise to the present appeal which in
any case fall within a narrow compass. One Smt. Taradevi, the deceased was
married to one Gajaram. From this marriage, she had two children namely
Rampal and Guddu (PW4). After the unfortunate death of her husband
Gajaram, she used to live with her younger son Guddu. The elder son Rampal
was married and had been living separately with his family though in the
same village. Gajoo, the accused/appellant, is the brother-in-law of
deceased Taradevi i.e. her husband's younger brother. He was also staying
separate, though near the house of Taradevi. After the demise of her
husband, there were some disputes regarding the division of property
between the deceased, on the one hand, and her elder son, Rampal and
brother-in-law, Gajoo on the other. The dispute was related to the
agricultural land. It is stated that Gajoo and Rampal both did not want to
give any land to Taradevi.
(3.) On the night of 1st July, 1987, a 'Satyanarayan Katha' had been
organised by Chetu Ram at his house in the village Kotda Kalyanpur. A
number of residents of the village had gone to attend the Katha. PW2,
Asharam and PW3, Kewalram along with other people were returning back to
their homes at midnight. On their way back both PW2 and PW3 heard moaning
sounds when they reached near the house of Taradevi. PW2 and PW3 were
carrying their torches and in the light of the torches they saw that
accused Gajoo was armed with a Daranti, Ext. 2 with which he was hitting
the deceased and accused Rampal had held her down, in the Aangan
(courtyard) of her house. On being challenged, both these witnesses were
threatened by Gajoo stating that they should go away from there. These two
witnesses are stated to have neither raised any alarm nor disclosed the
incident to anyone. The next morning, information of the incident was
given by PW4 to his maternal uncle Bhadu Ram, who was examined as PW1.
Upon receiving information, the matter was reported by PW1 to the police in
the morning of 2nd July, 1987. PW1 had lodged the written report vide
Ext. Ka-1 at Police Station, Sahaspur at about 10.30 in the morning. On
the basis of Ext. Ka-1, the FIR, a Check Report, Ext. Ka-16, was prepared.
Sub-Inspector Brahma Singh, PW6 started investigation in the matter. He
reached the place of incident and did Panchayatnama of the corpse of
Taradevi. After performing autopsy on the body of the deceased, vide Ext.
Ka-6, he noticed that there were wounds on the corpse and prepared a Report
Ext. Ka-8. Then he sent the body for post-mortem examination to Dehradun.
Blood stained soil, Ext-3 and plain soil samples, Ext-4 were collected from
the spot, and a site plan, Ext. Ka-12 was prepared. Dr. U.K. Chopra of
Doon Hospital on 3rd July, 1987 prepared the Post-Mortem Report, Ext. Ka-10
and found the following injuries on the body of the deceased;
"(i) Incised wound 4 cm x 1/2 cm muscle deep, 1 cm below the chin.
(ii) Incised wound 5 cm x 1 cm muscle deep, 2 cm below injury No.
1.
(iii) Three abraded contusions in the middle of the neck, sizes 1.5
cm x 1 cm; 2 cm x 1 cm; 1.5 cm x 1 cm.
(iv) Abrasion 3 cm x 2 cm on the back of the left elbow.
(v) Abrasion 3 cm x 2 cm on the back of the shoulder.
(vi) Abrasion 4 cm x 3 cm on the back of the right lumber region.";
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.