JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) By this order we will deal with and dispose of, the recommendations
made by the Central Empowered Committee (for short, 'CEC') in its report
dated 20th April, 2012. Since we have heard the affected parties, the
petitioners and the learned Amicus Curiae, we shall summarize the
contentions of the learned counsel for the respective parties. The learned
counsel appearing for the affected parties contended:
a. CEC has submitted its report without providing them an opportunity of
being heard.
b. CEC has exceeded its jurisdiction and enlarged the scope of the enquiry
beyond the reference made by the Court. Thus, the Court should not
accept any of the recommendations made by the CEC.
c. In relation to the alleged irregularities and illegalities pointed out
in the report of the CEC, even where criminality is involved or criminal
offences are suspected, the matters are sub judice before the Court of
competent jurisdiction. Thus, this Court should not pass any orders for
transferring the investigation of such offences to the Central Bureau of
Investigation (for short 'CBI') as it would seriously prejudice their
interests.
(2.) In order to deal with these contentions, it is necessary for this
Court to briefly refer to the background of these cases, which has resulted
in the filing of the unnumbered IA in Writ Petition No. 562/2009 and the
peculiar facts and circumstances in which the CEC has made its
recommendations.
(3.) Concerned with the rampant pilferage and illegal extraction of
natural wealth and resources, particularly iron ore, and the environmental
degradation and disaster that may result from unchecked intrusion into the
forest areas, this Court felt compelled to intervene. Vide its order dated
9th September, 2002 in T.N. Godavarman Thirumalpad v. Union of India & Ors.
[W.P.(C) No. 202 of 1995], this Court constituted the CEC to examine and
monitor the various activities infringing the laws protecting the
environment and also the preventive or punitive steps that may be required
to be taken to protect the environment. In addition to this general
concern for the environment, the order of this Court dated 9th September,
2002, this Court noted violations of its Orders and directed that the CEC
shall monitor implementation of all orders of the Court and shall place
before it any unresolved cases of non-compliance, including in respect of
the encroachments, removals, implementations of working plans, compensatory
afforestation, plantations and other conservation issues. In furtherance
to the said order, the Government framed a notification in terms of Section
33 of the Environment Protection Act, 1996. The CEC constituted by this
Court was proposed to be converted into a Statutory Committee. The draft
notification for the same was also placed before this Court on 9th
September, 2002. After approval, the Court directed that a formal
notification will be issued within a week and the functions and
responsibilities given to the CEC were to be exercised by the said
Statutory Committee. In fact, this Notification was issued on 17th
September, 2002.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.