JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) This appeal is directed against the judgment and order
passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of
Gujarat in Criminal Appeal No. 744/1985 dated
15.07.2002. By the impugned judgment and order, the High
Court has reversed the order of acquittal passed by the
Additional Sessions Judge, Amreli in Sessions Case No.
22/84 and convicted the two appellants for the offence
punishable under section 302 read with section 34 of the
Indian Penal Code, 1860 ["the IPC" for short],
sentencing them to imprisonment for life and a fine of Rs.
1000/- each, in default of which they are directed to
further undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months.
(2.) At the outset, we note that initially there were three
accused before the Trial Court, and they were all
acquitted for the offences alleged against them. During
the pendency of the appeal before the High Court, A1
(Kathi Fakira Vajsur) expired, and the appeal stood
abated as against him. The other two accused, namely A2
(Kathi Bharat Vajsur) and A3 (Kathi Ramku Vajsur) are
prosecuting this appeal. During the pendency of this
appeal, this Court had enlarged the appellants on bail
vide order dated 03.12.2002.
(3.) The factual scenario giving rise to the present appeal
is as follows:
The case of the prosecution is that, a part of the
adjoining land of the primary school in village Gigasan
was leased out to A1, where he had constructed a storage
tank for storage of kerosene. It was resolved by the
Gigasan Panchayat to give the road between the school and
the tank to the school for their use. Therefore,
Panchayat had proposed to construct a wall on the land so
granted. Prior to the date of the incident, when one
Amra Pitha and other labourers had commenced the work on
the said plot, A1 protested to it and did not permit them
to carry out the proposed work, due to which Amra Pitha
had to complain to the Sarpanch Jagu Dada and the
Secretary of the Panchayat Shri. Kanubhai about the
interference caused by A1. On the morning of the
incident, i.e. 30th March 1984, when Jagu Dada (PW6), Mulu
Dada (deceased) and Dhoha Vasta (Informant) informed the
President of the Taluka Development Officer about the
attitude of A1 towards Amra Pitha and other labourers, he
directed Mulu Dada to ignore the threat and complete the
construction as resolved by the Panchayat.
;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.