JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) Two contracts were entered into between the
appellants and the respondents - (i) for construction of
Tezpur Town Water Supply Scheme and (ii) for construction of
Tinsukia Town Water Supply Scheme. Certain disputes arose
between the parties concerning these contracts and to
resolve such disputes, sole arbitrator was appointed by the
Chief Justice of Gauhati High Court on March 26, 2002 under
Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996
(for short, '1996 Act'). On May 10, 2002 the appellants
filed application under Section 16 of the 1996 Act
questioning the jurisdiction of the sole arbitrator as
according to the appellants there was no arbitration clause
in the agreement. This application came to be rejected by
the sole arbitrator.
(2.) Thereafter, the sole arbitrator proceeded
with the arbitration and passed two awards in relation to
the above contracts in favour of the respondents on August
22, 2003. The awards were received by the appellants on
August 26, 2003. On January 2, 2004, the appellants made two
applications for setting aside the awards dated August 22,
2003 under Section 34 of the 1996 Act. These applications
were accompanied by two separate applications for extension
of time under Section 34(3) of the 1996 Act.
(3.) The District Judge, Kamrup, Guwahati,
dismissed the appellants' applications under Section 34 of
the 1996 Act on June 1, 2004 and June 5, 2004 on the ground
of limitation.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.