JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) These are appeals under Section 35L (b) of the Central
Excise Act, 1944 against the order dated 15.03.2005 of the
Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, West
Zonal Bench, Mumbai, (for short "the Tribunal").
(2.) The facts very briefly are that the appellant produces
inter alia Reduced Crude Oil (for short "RCO"). By
Notification No. 75/84-CE dated 01.03.1984, the Central
government in exercise of its powers under Sub-Rule 1 of
Rule 8 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 (for short "the
Rules") exempted goods described in Column 3 of the table
annexed to the notification from so much of the duty of
excise as is specified in the notification subject to the
intended use, or the conditions, if any, laid down in Column
5 of the table annexed to the notification. One of the goods
exempted from excise duty by the notification was RCO, if
produced only from indigenous crude oil subject to intended
use as fuel for generation of electrical energy by electricity
undertakings owned or controlled by the Central
Government or any State Government or any State
Electricity Board or any local authority or any licensee
under Part-II of the Indian Electricity Act, 1910 except those
who produce electrical energy not for sale but for their own
consumption or for supply to their own undertakings. The
proviso in the notification stated two conditions subject to
which the exemption was granted and one of the conditions
was that where the intended use is elsewhere than in the
factory of production, the procedure set out in Chapter X of
the Rules is followed. Rule 192 in Chapter X of the Rules
provided inter alia that where the Central Government has
by notification under Rule 8 sanctioned the remission of
duty on excisable goods other than salt used in a specified
industrial process and it is necessary for this purpose to
obtain an excise registration certificate, he should submit
the requisite application along with the proof of payment of
the registration fee and shall then be granted a registration
certificate in the proper form. Rule 192 further provided that
the concession shall, unless renewed by the Collector, cease
on the expiry of the registration certificate.
(3.) The Ahmedabad Electricity Company Ltd. had
obtained a registration certificate in Form CT-2 under Rule
192 of Chapter X of the Rules and on the strength of such
registration certificate, purchased RCO from the appellant
availing the exemption from excise duty under Notification
No. 75/84 dated 01.03.1984 (for short 'the exemption
notification'). The registration certificate obtained by the
Ahmedabad Electricity Company Ltd. expired on 31.12.1995
and a fresh registration was granted in its favour on
26.06.1996. After issuing two show-cause notices, the
Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise passed two orders
demanding excise duty of Rs. 32,35,485/- from the
appellant for RCO supplied to the Ahmedabad Electricity
Company Ltd. during the period 01.01.1996 to 25.06.1996
on the ground that the said company did not have a
registration certificate in Form CT-2 under Rule 192 of
Chapter X of the Rules during this period and, therefore, the
RCO supplied by the appellant to the Ahmedabad Electricity
Company Ltd. during this period was not exempt from
excise duty. The appellant paid the excise duty and
subsequently applied for refund contending that the
registration certificate in Form CT-2 had been obtained by
the Ahmedabad Electricity Company Ltd. on 26.06.1996.
The refund claims were rejected by the Assistant
Commissioner. Thereafter, the appellant filed appeals
before the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals) who
confirmed the demands of excise duty for the period from
01.01.1996 to 25.06.1996. The appellant then filed three
appeals before the Tribunal against the orders of
Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals) confirming
demand and the order rejecting the refund claim. By the
impugned order, the Tribunal dismissed the appeals saying
that as the statutory requirement of conditional exemption
notification had not been complied with by the appellant it
was not entitled to the exemption benefit.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.