JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) The short question to be decided in this petition is whether an
accused charged with various offences under the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in
short 'IPC') along with the provisions of the Scheduled Castes and the
Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (in short 'the SC/ST
Act') is entitled for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of
Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short 'the Code').
(2.) In the complaint filed by Savita Madhav Akhade Respondent No.3
herein, it has been alleged that she has been residing with her family
members at Khandeshwari, Taluq Karjat, Ahmednagar, Maharashtra and earning
their livelihood from agricultural work. It is further alleged that the
complainant is having an agricultural land adjacent to the agricultural
land of one Balu Bhanudas Pawar and Arun Bhanudas Pawar. On 15.06.2012,
the complainant allowed the rain water, which was accumulated, to flow into
the field of Balu Bhanudas Pawar. When the complainant and her husband was
standing on S.T. stand for going to Karjat, at that time, Balu Bhanudas
Pawar came there and abused them on caste on account of the rain water
flowing from the agricultural land of the complainant to his land. The
complainant has also alleged that after their return to home, the
petitioner along with other co-accused persons gathered at their house and
they again abused them on their caste and assaulted the complainant and her
family members by using sticks, stones, fighters etc. Thereafter, on the
same day, an FIR was registered being No. 139/2012 at Karjat P.S.,
Ahmednagar, Maharashtra.
(3.) The petitioners along with other co-accused filed an application for
anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code being Criminal
Miscellaneous Application No. 712 of 2012 before the Court of Sessions
Judge, Ahmednagar. By order dated 04.07.2012, the Additional Sessions
Judge rejected their application for anticipatory bail.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.