JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) This petition under Sections 11(5) and (9) of the
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 read with
paragraphs 2 and 3 of the appointment of the Arbitrators by
the Chief Justice of India Scheme, 1996 seeks appointment
of an independent and impartial person as an Arbitrator.
(2.) The applicant is a Company incorporated in Oman having
Registration No.1550438 and having its registered office at
Sohar Industrial Estate, PO Box 40, PC 327, Sohar,
Sultanate of Oman. The respondent is an Indian Company
incorporated under the provisions of the Companies Act,
1956 and having its registered office at Shanti Heights,
32/2, South Tukoganj, 2nd Floor, Above Cosmos Bank, Indore
452001 (Madhya Pradesh).
(3.) The applicant entered into a Sale Purchase Contract dated
18th June, 2008 bearing No.MIPSL/BILLET/EXP/08-09/003
(hereinafter referred to as the 'Contract') with the
respondent for supply of 2000 metric ton Prime Alloy Steel
Billets of specific chemical composition and physical
specifications more particularly described in Article 3 of
the Contract. In accordance with the terms and conditions
of the Contract, the applicant had opened a Letter of
Credit bearing No. DC BAF 080939 through HSBC Bank Middle
East Limited Muscat. The Letter of Credit was encashed by
the respondent on 21st August, 2008 through its bankers,
State Bank of Travancore. On 23rd August, 2008, the
applicant took delivery of first shipment of 243.2 Metric
Ton of Billets at Sohar Port. Upon unloading the
containers, the applicant noticed that far from complying
with the specifications mentioned in the Contract, the
Billets supplied by the respondents were of a very poor
quality. The Billets had cracks which were visible to naked
eyes. Even then, to confirm the defects, the applicant
chose some random Billets and sent the same to two
independent laboratories for testing. Both the
laboratories, after conducting the requisite tests,
confirmed that the Billets supplied by the respondent did
not comply with the specifications mentioned in the
Contract. The applicant sent an e-mail dated 31st August,
2008, informed the respondent about the non-conformity and
made it clear that the same were not acceptable. On the
same day, i.e., 31st August, 2008, another e-mail was sent
setting out in detail the defects in the Billets. It was
also mentioned that the applicant had done random cross
verifications on chemical composition, and the respondents
will be intimated after getting results. It is further
stated that the applicant has stopped de-stuffing of
containers, the respondent was requested to kindly arrange
to take back the rejected goods urgently and arrange for
the refund of the amount paid at the earliest. The
applicant informed the respondent that all unloading,
loading and demurrage at Port and with the shipping company
will be to your account.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.