JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) This appeal is directed against the judgment
and order dated August 9, 2005, of the Delhi High
Court by which it allowed the appeals of the two
respondents (defendant Nos.2 and 3 respectively
before the trial court), set aside the judgment and
decree passed by the trial court and permitted the
appellants to file their written statements within
four weeks from the date of the judgment, directing
further that the trial court would then proceed
with the suit and dispose it of in accordance with
law.
(2.) The appellant M/s. Housing Development and
Finance Corporation (in short "HDFC") instituted a
suit under Order XXXVII of the Code of Civil
Procedure, 1908, for realisation of its dues
against defendant No.1 (the borrower; not before
this Court) and the two respondents (defendant
Nos.2 & 3) who were the guarantors to the loan.
According to the case of the appellant-plaintiff,
defendant No.1 who was the owner of a plot of land
approached the appellant-plaintiff for a loan for
constructing a house on the plot. The loan was
sanctioned on October 29, 1997, and on December 9,
1997, defendant No.1 executed the Loan Agreement
and a promissory note in favour of the appellant.
In addition, defendant No.1 also created an
equitable mortgage in favour of the plaintiff by
depositing the title deeds of the plot in question.
The other two defendants, respondents before this
Court, stood guarantee for repayment of the loan
and executed the letters of guarantee on December
9, 1997. On the execution of the necessary
documents the loan was disbursed to defendant No.1
in two instalments.
(3.) The loan amount, along with interest at the
rate of 15% per annum was to be repaid in equalised
monthly instalments over a period of 180 months and
in case of default, according to the terms of the
loan, the outstanding would attract additional
interest @ 18% per annum.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.