JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) This appeal, by special leave, is directed against the judgment dated
10.04.2006 passed by the High Court of Calcutta affirming the conviction of
the accused-appellant as recorded by the learned trial court under Sections
302, 364 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). The accused-appellant,
Chunda Murmu, has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life
under Section 302 of IPC whereas under Sections 364 and 201 of IPC each, he
has been sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for seven years alongwith
fine. All the sentences have been directed to run concurrently.
(2.) The case of the prosecution, in short, inter-alia, is that on 15.03.1990,
one Anil Mardi, P.W.7, lodged a complaint in the Habibpur Police Station to
the effect that his sister Kamla, who was married to the accused appellant
for about six years, had been missing since 10.03.1990. It had been further
stated, in the complaint filed, that though the complainant had searched for his
sister, her whereabouts were not known and that the complainant suspected
that she was murdered by her husband, namely, the accused-appellant.
(3.) On the basis of the aforesaid complaint, P.W.16 P.K. Dutta, SubInspector of Police, filed the formal FIR Ex.6 on the basis of which
Habibpur P.S. Case No. 17/90 was registered. In the course of investigation,
the accused-appellant was arrested on 15.3.1990 at Palashdanga, whereafter,
he was brought to Habibpur Police Station. According to the prosecution, the
accused-appellant, while in custody, had made a statement that he had
murdered his wife and had kept the dead body concealed in the khuti ghar of
his father at village Horegram. Furthermore, according to the prosecution, on
the basis of the aforesaid statement made by the accused, the dead body of
deceased Kamla was recovered from the khuti ghar of one Charan Murmu, the
father of the accused-appellant, in the presence of seven witnesses including
the Block Development Officer, Shri Manas Kumar Mandal, P.W.15.
Thereafter inquest was held on the dead body which was sent for postmortem
examination. In the report of the post mortem, the cause of death was
mentioned by the Doctor as homicidal throttling. In the course of
investigation, the I.O. PW 16, also seized some mud stained hay from the
Kuthi ghar, some earth etc. in the presence of witnesses vide Seizure List
Ex.5. The wearing apparels of the deceased, i.e. mud stained green check
saree, mud stained green petty coat, black blouse stained with mud were also
seized in the presence of witnesses vide Seizure List Ex.3. Thereafter, at the
conclusion of the investigation, chargesheet was submitted against the
appellant-accused and his father Charan Murmu under Sections
302/364/201/34 of IPC. The father of accused-appellant died and charges
under the aforesaid Sections of the IPC were framed against the accused
appellant.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.