JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) Leave granted.
(2.) These two appeals, by special leave, can be disposed of
by a common judgment as they challenge the judgment andorder dated 24.9.2008 delivered by the Madras High Court
in Criminal R.C. Nos. 1439 and 1440 of 2005 filed by the
respondent.
(3.) It is necessary to state the facts which led to these
appeals. The respondent Selvamuthukani @ Selvamuthu is
the original complainant ( 'the complainant' for short). She
filed a private complaint in the court of Judicial Magistrate
No. 1, Coimbatore being CC No. 620 of 1992 against Kannan
(original accused 1 'A1' for short), M. Rangan Chettiar
(original accused 2 'A2' for short), Murugayee (original
accused 3 'A3' for short), K. Palaniammal (original accused
4 'A4' for short), Ganesan (original accused 5 'A5' for
short) and seven others. The complainant alleged that she
was married to A1 on 16.6.1980. According to her, during
the subsistence of her marriage with A1, A1 married A4 and
thus committed an offence punishable under Section 494 of
the Indian Penal Code (for short 'the IPC'). The
complainant further alleged that by actively assisting and
participating in the said marriage ceremony, the other
accused abetted the commission of said offence and they
are thus guilty of offence punishable under Section 494 read
with Section 109 of the IPC. After perusing the complaint
and deposition of the complainant, learned Magistrate
framed charge under Section 494 of the IPC against A1 and
under Section 494 read with Section 109 of the IPC against
A2 to A5. The complainant examined herself as PW-1. She
also examined two more witnesses (PW-2 and PW-3). The
accused examined two witnesses in support of their case
(DW-1 and DW-2). After perusing the evidence on record,
learned Magistrate held A1 guilty of offence punishable
under Section 494 of the IPC. He held A2 to A5 guilty of
offence punishable under Section 494 read with Section 109
of the IPC. He sentenced all the accused to undergo
rigorous imprisonment for two years each and to pay a fine
of Rs.1,000/- each. In default, the accused were to undergo
rigorous imprisonment for one month.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.