JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) I.A. No.1 of 2012 has been filed by the Supreme Court Advocate-on-
Record Association (SCAORA) in Civil Appeal Nos.3401 and 3402 of 2003,
which were disposed of on 26th September, 2011, and form the genesis of the
events leading to the filing of the said application. It has been a
painful experience for us to have had to hear this matter as it involves
two sections of the Supreme Court Bar Association whose unbecoming
posturing has cast dark shadows on the functioning of the Bar Association
even in the eyes of the general public and the litigants who throng the
Supreme Court each day for their cases.
(2.) While Civil Appeal No.3401 of 2003 was filed by three Appellants,
namely, (i) Supreme Court Bar Association (Regd.) through its Honorary
Secretary, Mr. Ashok Arora; (ii) Mr. Ashok Arora in his capacity as the
Honorary Secretary of the Supreme Court Bar Association; and (iii) Ms.
Sunita B. Rao, Coordinator, Implementation Committee, Supreme Court Bar
Association, (hereinafter referred to as "SCBA"), on the other hand, Civil
Appeal No.3402 of 2003 has been filed by the Supreme Court Bar Association
through its Honorary Secretary. Both the Appeals are directed against the
interim order dated 5th April, 2003, passed by the learned Civil Judge on
an application filed under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 read with Section 151
of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, filed in Civil Suit Nos.100 and 101
of 2003. By the common order, the Appellants were restrained from
implementing the Resolution dated February 18, 2003, amending Rule 18 of
the Rules and Regulations of SCBA till the final disposal of both the
suits. While Shri B.D. Kaushik is the sole Respondent in Civil Appeal
No.3401 of 2003, Shri A.K. Manchanda is the sole Respondent in Civil Appeal
No.3402 of 2003. Both the Respondents are Advocates who are practising in
Delhi and are Members of the SCBA, the Delhi Bar Association and the Bar
Association of the Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi.
(3.) The Supreme Court Bar Association is a Society registered under the
Societies Registration Act, 1860, on 25th August, 1999, under Registration
No.35478 of 1999. In keeping with the provisions of the Societies
Registration Act, 1860, the SCBA has framed its Memorandum of Association
and Rules and Regulations, Rule 4 whereof divides the Members into four
separate classes, namely, :-
(i) Resident Members;
(ii) Non-Resident Members;
iii) Associate Members; and
iv) Non-Active Members.
Rule 5(v)(a) provides that in terms of Rule 5, an Applicant found to
be suitable to be made a Member of the Association would be made Member
initially on temporary basis for a period of two years. It also provides
that a person who is made such a Member, would be identified as a temporary
Member who would be entitled to avail the facilities of the Association,
such as library and canteen, but would not have a right to participate in
general meetings, as prescribed in Rule 21 or to contest and vote at the
elections, as provided in Rule 18.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.