JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) Leave granted.
(2.) We are, in this case, called upon to decide the question as to
whether the transfer of land from a member of Scheduled Caste to a juristic
person, other than Scheduled Caste, is void, in view of the provisions of
Section 42(b) of the Rajasthan Tenancy Act, 1955 (for short 'the Act').
(3.) The High Court of Rajasthan has answered the above question in
several cases holding that such a transfer would not be hit by the above
mentioned provision, since the expression 'person' would not take in a
'juristic person' and that juristic person does not have a caste and,
therefore, any transfer made by a Scheduled Caste person would not be hit
by Section 42(b) of the Act.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.