JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) Leave granted in S.L.P. (C) Nos. 875 of 2008, 10759 of 2010
and 6501 of 2011.
(2.) This batch of appeals, by grant of leave, arises out of
judgments dated 26
th
August, 2002 in C.E.R. No. 11 of 2001,
11
th
April, 2007 in C.E.A. No. 10 of 2004, 8
th
September, 2009
in C.E.A. No. 6 of 2003 and 25
th
October, 2010 in C.E.R. No. 51
of 2002 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad.
By the impugned judgments, rendered in the reference
applications filed by the assessee, under Section 35H of the
Central Excise Act, 1944 (for short "the Act"), the questions
referred by the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control)
Appellate Tribunal, as it then existed, (for short "the
Tribunal") have been answered in favour of the revenue.
(3.) In order to comprehend the controversy at hand, a few
material facts may be noticed. At the outset, it may be noted
that these appeals relate to the period between August 1992
to June 1996.
The appellant -assessee, a body corporate, claiming to be
pioneers in the concept of flexible packaging, is engaged in the
manufacture of various types of packaging machines, marketed
as Automatic form fill and seal machines (for short "F&S
machines"), classified under chapter heading 8422.00 of the
Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 (for short "the
Tariff Act"). The literature placed on record shows that the
assessee has prototype models of F&S machines with technical
details like web width, Roll diameter, Core diameter, typical
material range, the type of material to be packed, etc.
According to the assessee, the machines are 'made to order',
inasmuch as all the dimensions of the packaging/sealing
pouches, for which the F&S machine is required, are provided
by the customer. The purchase order contains the following
inspection clause:
"Inspection/Trial will be carried out at your works
in the presence of (sic) our Engineer before
dispatch of equipment for the performance of the
machine."
Flexible Laminated Plastic Film in roll form & Poly Paper
which are duty paid, falling under chapter headings 3920.38 and
4811.30 of the Schedule to the Tariff Act, are used for testing,
tuning and adjusting various parts of the F&S machine in terms
of the afore-extracted condition in the purchase order. As the
machine ordered is customer specific, if after inspection by the
customer it is found deficient in respect of its operations for
being used for a particular specified packaging, it cannot be
delivered to the customer, till it is re-adjusted and tuned to
make it match with the required size of the pouches as per the
customer's requirement. On completion of the above process
and when the customer is satisfied, an entry is made in the RG 1
register declaring the machine as manufactured, ready for
clearance.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.