BHARATBHAI JIMI PREMCHANDBHAI Vs. STATE OF GUJARAT
LAWS(SC)-2002-10-13
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Decided on October 31,2002

BHARATBHAI Appellant
VERSUS
STATE OF GUJARAT Respondents




JUDGEMENT

- (1.)Deceased Raghunath Yadav was convicted and sentenced by the Sessions Court at Varanasi for the murder of father of Brijeshsinh - who is one of the absconding accused in the present case. While on bail in appeal, Raghunath Yadav, apprehending danger to his life, came to reside at Mehsana in the State of Gujarat. On 14th June, 1992, Raghunath Yadav was murdered at Mehsana.
(2.)In TADA Case Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 7 of 1996, twelve accused were tried by the Designated Judge, Ahmedabad for offences under Secs. 302, 397, 307 and 120B I.P.C. Sections 3(1), 3(3), 3(4) and 5 of the Terrorist And Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 (for short TADA Act) and under Sec. 25(1)(a) and (b) of the Arms Act.
(3.)The charge-sheet against accused Nos. 1 to 3 was filed on 6th April, 1993, against accused Nos. 4 to 6 on 1st July, 1994, against accused Nos. 7 to 11 on 15th April, 1996 and against accused No. 12 on 26th November, 1996. The charges were that the accused persons and the absconding accused-Sharifkhan Azizkhan Pathan, Daud Ibrahim Meman, Brijeshsinh Bholansinh. Radayanarayansinh @ Harinarayansinh @ Bhulansinh Thakur, Unita Prajapati, deceased accused Sunil Savat and Abdullatif Abdul Vahab Shaikh had hatched a conspiracy to commit murder of Raghunath Yadav, and thereby, committed criminal acts punishable under Sec. 120B of the Indian Penal Code; as per the above conspiracy on 14th June, 1992, accused Nos. 1, 3, 4, 8, 9 and the absconding accused Radayanarayansinh @ Harinarayansinh @ Bhuvansinh Thakur had gone to S.T. Bus stand, Mehsana and after obtaining information about the identification of the deceased as a part of the conspiracy made firing with the pistol and caused murder of Raghunath Yadav and created an atmosphere of terror and fear at the said place and then fled away in the vehicles, and thus, committed offences punishable under Sec. 302 read with Sec. 120B I.P.C. and under Secs. 3(1) and 3(3) of TADA Act read with Sec. 120B I.P.C.; while fleeing away from Mehsana after firing and committing murder as aforesaid. Police Sub-Inspector, Zala who tried to arrest the accused was fired at by the accused causing him injuries and had run away taking the Government Maruti Gypsy with them, and thus, committing offence punishable under Secs. 307 and 120B I.P.C. and under Secs. 3(1), 3(3), 3(4) and 5 of the TADA Act read with Sec. 120B I.P.C. and Sec. 397 read with Sec. 120B I.P.C.


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.