COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX BAREILLY Vs. KISAN SEHKARI CHINI MILL LIMITED
LAWS(SC)-2002-1-75
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA (FROM: ALLAHABAD)
Decided on January 18,2002

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,BAREILLY Appellant
VERSUS
KISAN SEHKARI CHINI MILL LIMITED Respondents


Cited Judgements :-

MAJOR S N TRIPATHI VS. ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA [LAWS(ALL)-2005-3-231] [REFERRED TO]
SATISH KUMAR VS. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE BUDAUN [LAWS(ALL)-2004-8-208] [REFERRED TO]
ARTI PANDEY VS. VISHNU KANT TIWARI [LAWS(ALL)-2012-9-155] [REFERRED TO]
M/S AAJ PRAKASHAN LTD. VS. PRESIDING OFFICER, INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (III) KANPU [LAWS(ALL)-2007-4-508] [REFERRED TO]
PROFESSOR MADAN MOHAN RAJPUT VS. STATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS [LAWS(ALL)-2016-10-71] [REFERRED TO]


JUDGEMENT

Syed Shah Mohammed Quadri, J. - (1.)Heard Mr. Altaf Ahmad, the learned Additional Solicitor General appearing for the appellants and Mr. Rakesh Dwivedi, the learned Additional Solicitor General appearing for the respondent.
(2.)Leave is granted.
(3.)This appeal is directed against the judgment and order of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in ITA No. 155/97 dated October 15, 1999 taking the view that the following question is not a statable question of law. The question reads as follows :
"Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was legally justified in holding that the incentive bonus paid by the assessee is allowable under Section 37 if it is not admissible under specific Section 36(1)(ii) of the I.-T. Act, 1961 -



Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.