MAHENDER PRATAP Vs. KRISHAN PAL
LAWS(SC)-2002-11-43
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA (FROM: PUNJAB & HARYANA)
Decided on November 22,2002

MAHENDER PRATAP Appellant
VERSUS
KRISHAN PAL Respondents





Cited Judgements :-

BANWARLAL BHAGWANDAS PUROHIT VS. VILAS MUTTEMWAR [LAWS(BOM)-2005-10-249] [REFERRED]
M CHINNASAMY VS. K C PALANISAMY [LAWS(SC)-2003-11-54] [RELIED ON]
T. SENGUTTUVAN VS. K. ASHOKKUMAR [LAWS(MAD)-2024-3-335] [REFERRED TO]
RAJESWARAN VS. R. MURALI MANOHAR [LAWS(MAD)-2024-3-158] [REFERRED TO]
RADHA GAHLOT VS. SASHI JATAV & ORS [LAWS(MPH)-2014-5-303] [REFERRED]
SMT. LADKUNWAR KUSHWAHA VS. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH [LAWS(MPH)-2016-4-100] [REFERRED TO]
DEVKI NANDAN DUBEY VS. PURSHOTTAM SAHU [LAWS(MPH)-2018-12-139] [REFERRED TO]
SHARMAJEET VS. STATE OF U.P. AND ORS. [LAWS(ALL)-2018-3-36] [REFERRED TO]
TAPEN SIGA VS. DIKTO YEKAR [LAWS(GAU)-2019-2-115] [REFERRED TO]
SHANKAR SINGH VS. ISHWAR LAL & ORS. [LAWS(MPH)-2005-5-65] [REFERRED TO]
SHYAM BAI VS. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH [LAWS(MPH)-2006-4-14] [REFERRED TO]
BALMUKUND SINGH GAUTAM VS. NEENA VIKRAM VERMA AND ORS [LAWS(MPH)-2012-10-272] [REFERRED]
CHANDESHWAR SAW VS. BRIJ BHUSHAN PRASAD [LAWS(SC)-2020-1-79] [REFERRED TO]
BENDALAM APPANRAO VS. BENDALAM RAM MURTHY NAIDU [LAWS(APH)-2006-11-113] [REFERRED TO]
BABAJI DHAL VS. ELECTION OFFICER-CUM-B.D.O. AND ORS. [LAWS(ORI)-2014-11-100] [REFERRED TO]
NEKI BAI VS. MITHLESH [LAWS(MPH)-2011-2-117] [REFERRED TO]
RAMESH CHAND VS. ISHWAR DASS DHIMAN [LAWS(HPH)-2013-12-42] [REFERRED TO]
MANGLA RAM VS. SITAL DASS [LAWS(RAJ)-2004-8-42] [REFERRED TO]
JAHANARA BEGUM VS. LAYLA BEGUM [LAWS(GAU)-2013-12-24] [REFERRED TO]
BRIJENDRA KUMAR VS. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE MAHOBA [LAWS(ALL)-2009-4-125] [REFERRED TO]
RABINARAYAN DAS VS. STATE OF ODISHA [LAWS(ORI)-2023-2-85] [REFERRED TO]
BALWAN SINGH VS. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS [LAWS(MPH)-2018-5-141] [REFERRED TO]
PRATAP SINGH VS. STATE OF UP [LAWS(ALL)-2008-5-33] [REFERRED TO]
SADHNA VS. NIRMALA DEVI AND 5 OTHERS [LAWS(ALL)-2018-4-111] [REFERRED TO]
GOURI BAI PATEL VS. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH [LAWS(CHH)-2017-5-27] [REFERRED TO]
DURGA DEVI VS. STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH [LAWS(HPH)-2017-6-23] [REFERRED TO]
ABDUL KAREEM M ALIAS KUNHIPPA VS. KUNNATHADATHIL KUTTYHASSAN [LAWS(KER)-2009-3-89] [REFERRED TO]
REKHA RANI BHARALUA VS. KABITA GOGOI [LAWS(GAU)-2010-10-2] [REFERRED TO]
K LAXMAN VS. NAYINI NARASIMHA REDDY [LAWS(APH)-2008-1-80] [REFERRED]
MUKESH KUMAR VS. THE STATE OF BIHAR [LAWS(PAT)-2014-1-204] [REFERRED TO]
ASHA RAJ VS. RETURNING OFFICER PANCHAYAT AND OTHERS [LAWS(MPH)-2018-4-215] [REFERRED TO]
RANI MARSKOLE VS. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH [LAWS(MPH)-2016-2-80] [REFERRED TO]
ASHOK KUMAR TIWARI VS. PRES.AUTH./SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE GAURIGANJ AMETHI [LAWS(ALL)-2019-12-94] [REFERRED TO]
SHAMIM KHAN VS. ADIL HUSAIN AND ORS. [LAWS(ALL)-2015-12-144] [REFERRED TO]
RAMESH CHANDRA JOSHI VS. DISTRICT JUDGE, ALMORA [LAWS(UTN)-2007-10-20] [REFERRED TO]
KAMLA DEVI VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2009-5-850] [REFERRED TO]
KANCHAN SINGH VS. MANISH JAISWAL [LAWS(ALL)-2007-7-206] [REFERRED TO]
A DHANWANTI CHANDELA VS. BALBIR TYAGI [LAWS(DLH)-2011-4-41] [REFERRED TO]
SMTI. PURABI BORAH DAS W/O VS. SMTI. KIRAN SAIKIA AND ORS D/O [LAWS(GAU)-2016-10-38] [REFERRED TO]
MARKIO TADO VS. TAKAM SORANG [LAWS(GAU)-2010-9-70] [REFERRED TO]
PRADEP KUMAR RAI VS. RETURNING OFFICER [LAWS(MPH)-2023-8-158] [REFERRED TO]
DARBARA SINGH GURU VS. MOHAMMAD SADIQUE [LAWS(P&H)-2015-4-275] [REFERRED TO]
RAVINDER KUMARA RAWAL VS. V.K. SOOD [LAWS(P&H)-2010-1-555] [REFERRED TO]
GANESH RAM GAYARI VS. BAGDIRAM [LAWS(MPH)-2013-3-45] [REFERRED TO]
BHAJNO VS. BIMLA DEVI [LAWS(P&H)-2009-10-41] [REFERRED TO]
ABDUL KAREEM VS. K K HASSAN [LAWS(KER)-2009-3-94] [REFERRED TO]
M KALAVATHY VS. K CHITRA [LAWS(MAD)-2008-9-470] [REFERRED TO]


JUDGEMENT

Dharmadhikari, J. - (1.)This is an appeal under S. 116 A of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 [for short the Act] against the judgment dated 19-11-2001 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Harayana in Election Petition No. 6 of 2000.
(2.)The appellant lost election to the Legislative Assembly seat for constituency No. 52, Mewala Maharajpur by a margin of 161 votes.
(3.)The appellant filed an election petition seeking relief of recount of votes on the ground that serious irregularities were committed in counting of votes on electronic voting machines which were used in the above said election.


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.