GUPTA CHEMICALS PVT LIMITED Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
LAWS(SC)-2002-4-105
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA (FROM: RAJASTHAN)
Decided on April 18,2002

GUPTA CHEMICALS PRIVATE LIMITED Appellant
VERSUS
STATE OF RAJASTHAN Respondents


Cited Judgements :-

PI INDUSTRIES LTD AND ORS VS. STATE OF PUNJAB [LAWS(P&H)-2018-7-254] [REFERRED TO]
USHODAYA ENTERPRISES PVT LTD VS. STATE OF GUJARAT [LAWS(GJH)-2013-8-54] [REFERRED TO]
BRITANNIA NEW ZEALAND FOODS PVT LTD VS. DIRECTOR PFA [LAWS(DLH)-2012-6-23] [REFERRED TO]
HYDERABAD BEVERAGES PRIVATE LIMITED VS. STATE OF A P [LAWS(APH)-2006-4-1] [REFERRED TO]
NESTLE INDIA LIMITED VS. STATE OF GUJARAT [LAWS(GJH)-2010-10-162] [REFERRED TO]
JAYAKRISHNA PESTICIDES P LTD VS. STATE OF TAMIL NADU [LAWS(MAD)-2008-9-4] [REFERRED TO]
MANOJ KUMAR VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2011-9-99] [REFERRED TO]
HUKAM CHAND RAMAN KUMAR VS. STATE OF PUNJAB [LAWS(P&H)-2013-8-961] [REFERRED]
SUSHIL KUMAR SINGH, SON OF LATE MUSAFIR SINGH VS. INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD. [LAWS(PAT)-2009-7-68] [REFERRED TO]
BHARAT INSECTICIDES LTD VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2011-9-95] [REFERRED TO]
PEPSICO INDIA HOLDINGS PVT.LTD. VS. STATE OF GUJARAT [LAWS(GJH)-2017-10-1] [REFERRED TO]
INDOFIL INDUSTRIES LTD. AND OTHERS VS. STATE OF PUNJAB [LAWS(SC)-2017-7-41] [REFERRED TO]
SANDOZ (INDIA) LTD VS. STATE OF PUNJAB [LAWS(P&H)-2004-11-25] [REFERRED TO]
RAM KRISHAN MUDHOLKAR VS. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH [LAWS(TLNG)-2022-2-101] [REFERRED TO]
PEPSICO INDIA HOLDINGS PVT.LTD VS. STATE OF GUJARAT [LAWS(GJH)-2016-9-17] [REFERRED TO]
GLAXO INDIA LTD VS. STATE OF M. P. [LAWS(MPH)-2020-1-372] [REFERRED TO]
PEPSICO INDIA HOLDINGS PVT. LTD VS. STATE OF GUJARAT [LAWS(GJH)-2012-4-291] [REFERRED TO]
ASHOK BHAVE, DIRECTOR, FIRM PARLE AGRO PVT. LTD VS. STATE OF M.P [LAWS(MPH)-2019-9-20] [REFERRED TO]
NORTHERN MINERAL LTD VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(SC)-2010-7-63] [REFERRED TO]
AAR DEE ENTERPRISES AND OTHERS VS. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS [LAWS(P&H)-2014-11-389] [REFERRED]
UNITED PESTICIDES THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR VS. STATE OF HARYANA [LAWS(P&H)-2004-8-32] [REFERRED TO]


JUDGEMENT

- (1.)Leave granted.
(2.)Heard learned counsel for the parties.
(3.)In these appeals filed by the accused against the judgment of the Rajasthan High court dated 1/5/2001, declining to interfere with the criminal proceeding instituted against the appellant in exercise of the power under section 482 of the Criminal procedure Code is under challenge.


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.