JUDGEMENT
-
(1.)Leave granted.
(2.)Failure on the part of plaintiffs to give correct, specific and exact description of the immovable property forming subject-matter of suit, added by omission on the part of the trial Court to insist on compliance by the draftsman of the plaint with the rules of pleadings, has resulted in a decree which is yet to witness its full execution and satisfaction though the litigation has by this time stretched over two decades.
(3.)The parties are appearing in person and we have heard them at length. We propose to make an order which would finally bury - to the extent we can - the hatches so far wielded by the parties. The directions which we propose to make, after briefly setting out the facts, are partly in exercise of jurisdiction conferred on this Court by Art. 142 of the Constitution of India for doing complete justice in the lis before us.
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.