PRATIBHA SINGH Vs. SHANTI DEVI PRASAD
LAWS(SC)-2002-11-34
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Decided on November 29,2002

PRATIBHA SINGH Appellant
VERSUS
SHANTI DEVI PRASAD Respondents


Cited Judgements :-

ANNALAKSHMI VS. JAGADEESWARI [LAWS(MAD)-2019-7-208] [REFERRED TO]
M S MUNUSAMY VS. G VENKO SIVASAKTHI [LAWS(MAD)-2011-6-352] [REFERRED TO]
HINDUSTAN PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD VS. AJAY BHATIA [LAWS(SC)-2022-9-108] [REFERRED TO]
HIND FREIGHT SERVICES PVT LTD VS. ANKIT AGARWAL [LAWS(NCD)-2012-8-81] [REFERRED TO]
VIRENDRAPRASAD SRIVASTAVA VS. VAISHYA BROTHERS AND CO P LTD [LAWS(ALL)-2007-12-169] [REFERRED TO]
DERIVATE CASOIL LTD VS. AGRO TECH FOODS LIMITED [LAWS(APH)-2008-6-32] [REFERRED TO]
KSHETRIMAYUM IBOHAL SINGH VS. STATE OF MANIPUR [LAWS(GAU)-2005-9-21] [REFERRED TO]
DWARAKA PRASAD AGARWALLA VS. NIL KAMAL BEZBARUA [LAWS(GAU)-2015-1-2] [REFERRED TO]
FIRTU RAM VS. FIRATRAM KASHYAP AND ANOTHER [LAWS(CHH)-2017-12-7] [REFERRED TO]
GODAWARIBAI PURUSHOTTAM BAWASKAR VS. SITARAM BHAGWAN PAITHANE [LAWS(BOM)-2020-1-298] [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF MIZORAM VS. VANTHANGLIANA [LAWS(GAU)-2020-7-11] [REFERRED TO]
NAGARPALIKA PARISHAD VS. MOHAN SINGH SISODIYA [LAWS(MPH)-2009-10-32] [REFERRED TO]
SAROJ VS. INDERCHAND NAHTA [LAWS(MPH)-2015-1-158] [REFERRED TO]
SARATH KAKUMANU VS. VEERAPPAN ARUNACHALAM [LAWS(MAD)-2021-10-88] [REFERRED TO]
DES RAJ VS. MAHAVIR PARSHAD [LAWS(HPH)-2007-5-36] [REFERRED TO]
MUMTAZ BEGUM VS. M. BALAJI [LAWS(KAR)-2020-9-670] [REFERRED TO]
SWATANTRA PRAKASH VERMA VS. RAMESH CHAND [LAWS(ALL)-2013-3-129] [REFERRED TO]
LATE NAWAB BASHEER JUNG VS. LATEEFUDDIN KHAN [LAWS(APH)-2004-10-89] [REFERRED TO]
D LATE NAWAB BASHEER JUNG DIED VS. M A BARI [LAWS(APH)-2004-10-9] [REFERRED TO]
YEMPALLA RAMAAIAH VS. PALLAMPARTHI KRISHNAREDDY [LAWS(APH)-2006-6-152] [REFERRED TO]
NAMDEO VS. SHRIPATI [LAWS(BOM)-2021-6-140] [REFERRED TO]
NATESAN VS. SHANMUGAM [LAWS(MAD)-2009-12-176] [REFERRED TO]
SHIVASHANKARGOUDA VS. BAGALKOT UDYOG LTD. [LAWS(KAR)-2017-9-113] [REFERRED TO]
DEVAKI JOGI @ PURUSHA VS. M. SHASHISHEKAR KAMATH [LAWS(KAR)-2017-1-284] [REFERRED TO]
Retnasawamy VS. Justin [LAWS(MAD)-2004-7-14] [REFERRED TO]
B JOTHI VS. S RANGANAYAKI [LAWS(MAD)-2017-12-296] [REFERRED TO]
DEO KUMAR SAH VS. MAHESH PD RAI [LAWS(PAT)-2004-5-32] [REFERRED TO]
PACKIASELVI VS. YESUBALAN [LAWS(MAD)-2017-9-86] [REFERRED TO]
PALANIAMMAL VS. SUKUMAR [LAWS(MAD)-2018-2-651] [REFERRED TO]
MEHATAB BEGUM VS. BHAGWANDAS [LAWS(APH)-2008-9-114] [REFERRED TO]
ANIL KR RAY VS. KSHAMA RANI DUTTA [LAWS(CAL)-2008-4-21] [REFERRED TO]
PRADEEP KAPOOR VS. LAXMI NARAIN KAPOOR [LAWS(ALL)-2011-4-43] [REFERRED TO]
SAJAL KUMAR AND ANOTHER VS. DISTRICT JUDGE BALLIA & 14 OTHERS [LAWS(ALL)-2016-5-301] [REFERRED]
YOGINDER KUMAR SUD VS. THAKUR RAJIV SINGH [LAWS(P&H)-2022-4-109] [REFERRED TO]
JAMBUVENI VS. LEELAVATHY AND ORS. [LAWS(MAD)-2016-1-16] [REFERRED TO]
HANSABAI SRIPATI BHOSALE VS. PARUBAI GOPAL BHOSALE [LAWS(BOM)-2009-8-82] [REFERRED TO]
SHRI KISHAN CHAND DASS & ORS. VS. KUONI TRAVEL (INDIA) PRIVATE LTD. [LAWS(DLH)-2016-9-5] [REFERRED TO]
CHAKKA RANGA RAO VS. MOLLA MUSTARI BANU [LAWS(APH)-2006-6-65] [REFERRED TO]
SURENDRA KUMAR GUPTA VS. NARAYAN RAM [LAWS(CHH)-2010-10-6] [REFERRED TO]
MADHAV TUKARAM KULAL VS. KISAN AYAJI BODAKHE [LAWS(BOM)-2007-3-167] [REFERRED TO]
KAILASH KUMAR VS. GANESH KUMAR [LAWS(GAU)-2019-1-97] [REFERRED TO]
BHUPAT PATEL VS. STATE OF M P [LAWS(MPH)-2016-3-75] [REFERRED TO]
JAYANTA KUMAR VS. HARENDRA KUMAR [LAWS(GAU)-2024-3-83] [REFERRED TO]
SARAMMA SAMUEL VS. ABRAHAM JACOB [LAWS(KER)-2022-9-268] [REFERRED TO]
NIYAMAT ALI MOLLA VS. SONARGON HOUSING CO OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD [LAWS(SC)-2007-10-77] [REFERRED TO]
BILSANUR CHANDRAPPA REDDY VS. CHENNAKESHAVA REDDY; SECRETARY; ANAGADI SHIVALINGAPPA [LAWS(KAR)-2015-7-412] [REFERRED]
K. PRAKASH VS. GANGAPPA CHANDALLI AND ORS. [LAWS(KAR)-2015-9-69] [REFERRED TO]
R.R. MAZUMDAR VS. ZENITH PHARMACEUTICALS [LAWS(GAU)-2017-8-64] [REFERRED TO]
MD. HARUNOR ROSHID AND ANOTHER VS. SMTI JYSOTSNA PHUKAN AND 2 OTHERS [LAWS(GAU)-2017-8-145] [REFERRED TO]
M.K. JOKAI AGRI PLANTATIONS (P) LTD. AND ORS. VS. BHAWANI SHANKAR BAGARIA AND ORS. [LAWS(GAU)-2016-2-10] [REFERRED TO]
SHRI BALKRISHNA SHIVRAM NAIK GAONKAR, AGED 44 YEARS, LANDLORD, MARRIED, AND HIS WIFE, VS. STATE OF GOA, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF GOA, SECRETARIAT, PANAJI, GOA., [LAWS(BOM)-2011-11-181] [REFERRED TO]
HARINDAR PRASAD SAHANI VS. CHANCHAL GHOSE AND ORS. [LAWS(GAU)-2003-3-68] [REFERRED TO]
SHANTHAMMA VS. K S KRISHNA [LAWS(KAR)-2016-6-23] [REFERRED TO]
OM PARKASH VS. VINOD KUMAR [LAWS(P&H)-2017-3-15] [REFERRED TO]
MARYKUTTY PHILIP VS. VARGHESE ABRAHAM [LAWS(KER)-2007-11-27] [REFERRED TO]
AKBAR ALI KHAN VS. JAMELA BEGUM [LAWS(GAU)-2015-3-61] [REFERRED TO]
RAMACHANDRAN VS. SANKARAIAH NAIDU [LAWS(MAD)-2010-5-57] [REFERRED TO]
ABDUL RAZZAK VS. ABDUL HAQUE [LAWS(GAU)-2024-5-33] [REFERRED TO]
NAROTTAM BARMAN VS. SUMI SUTRADHAR [LAWS(GAU)-2020-12-10] [REFERRED TO]
BHOLA PRASAD KORI VS. MST.URMILA [LAWS(CHH)-2019-9-98] [REFERRED TO]
GOLDSTONE EXPORTS PRIVATE LIMITED VS. CYRUS INVESTMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [LAWS(APH)-2004-10-13] [REFERRED TO]
Goldstone Exports Private Limited VS. Cyrus Investments Private Limited [LAWS(APH)-2004-4-4] [REFERRED TO]
KRISHAN KUMAR VS. NEELAM DEVI [LAWS(DLH)-2012-3-351] [REFERRED TO]
SANJAY MAKHANLAL GUPTA VS. ANANT BHIVA MADHAVI [LAWS(BOM)-2023-9-68] [REFERRED TO]
SREEDHAR YESHWANT MORAJKAR VS. PUSHPA MANDREKAR [LAWS(BOM)-2022-12-121] [REFERRED TO]
KISHAN LAL VS. MAHESH KUMAR [LAWS(P&H)-2018-11-75] [REFERRED TO]
DASHMESH RICE MILLS VS. GOVIND RAM ANIL KUMAR [LAWS(P&H)-2003-5-85] [REFERRED TO]
BHARAT SHANTILAL SHAH VS. ROYAL PALMS I PVT LTD [LAWS(BOM)-2007-10-192] [REFERRED TO]
RAMNORD RESEARCH LAB PVT. LTD VS. RANVIR KUMAR [LAWS(DLH)-2009-11-225] [REFERRED TO]
SHANKARLAL CHHANULAL NAGPURE VS. PRAMODKUMAR PRAHLADRAI AGRAWAL AND ANOTHER [LAWS(BOM)-2018-3-281] [REFERRED TO]
MOHNA KASHINATH NAIK, SON OF LATE KASHINATH NAIK VS. PRAKASH GAJANAN SUKTHANKAR [LAWS(BOM)-2018-1-256] [REFERRED TO]
KISHUN SHARMA VS. RAM PREET MAHATO & ORS. [LAWS(JHAR)-2013-7-233] [REFERRED TO]
VIJAY K DOSHI AS DIRECTOR OF VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(GJH)-2011-12-320] [REFERRED TO]
KAMAL KISHORE MIMANI VS. AJAY MIMANI [LAWS(CAL)-2024-2-89] [REFERRED TO]
M.K.JOKAI AGRI PLANTATIONS PVT. LTD (M/S) VS. LEGAL HEIRS OF ALOK BAGARIA [LAWS(GAU)-2016-2-16] [REFERRED TO]
DEVARAJAN VS. C.P. MYTHILI [LAWS(MAD)-2020-8-339] [REFERRED TO]
BHAGWAN DASS VS. PAWAN KUMAR [LAWS(P&H)-2013-10-67] [REFERRED TO]
D. H. RAMANJINAPPA VS. H. .S SHANKAR [LAWS(KAR)-2023-7-1587] [REFERRED TO]
T GUNABALAN VS. T SELVARAJAN [LAWS(MAD)-2010-11-102] [REFERRED TO]
SHANMUGAM VS. ARTHANARI [LAWS(MAD)-2010-6-80] [REFERRED TO]
CHHAJU VS. GIAN CHAND [LAWS(HPH)-2013-5-78] [REFERRED TO]
BHANDUL SHAW VS. TARAK SHAW [LAWS(CAL)-2023-9-51] [REFERRED TO]
THEMMA VS. INFANT JESUS CHURCH [LAWS(KER)-2016-10-32] [REFERRED TO]
PAWAN KR. AGARWAL VS. ISHWAR PRASAD JALAN [LAWS(GAU)-2018-6-163] [REFERRED TO]
GITA RANI DHAR AND ORS. VS. MILAN KANTI DEY AND ORS. [LAWS(GAU)-2015-6-63] [REFERRED TO]
SMTI. AYITA BEGUM CHAUDHURY VS. SRI KUMAR KANTI SINHA [LAWS(GAU)-2017-6-25] [REFERRED TO]
HINDUSTAN PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD. VS. AJAY BHATIA [LAWS(DLH)-2021-11-85] [REFERRED TO]
PRAKASH BHAGAWATI VS. LEGAL HEIRS OF PHANIDHAR BORA [LAWS(GAU)-2021-11-99] [REFERRED TO]
VIRENDRA KUMAR MARKANDE VS. TARSEEM CHAND JAIN [LAWS(DLH)-2013-10-240] [REFERRED TO]
PRATAPSINGH RAOJI RANE VS. JITENDRA ZOIBA RANE AND ORS. [LAWS(BOM)-2015-12-159] [REFERRED TO]
GLORIO ROSARIO FURTADO AND ORS. VS. THE CATHEDRAL CHAPTER OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF GOA AND DAMAN AND ORS. [LAWS(BOM)-2015-7-82] [REFERRED TO]


JUDGEMENT

- (1.)Leave granted.
(2.)Failure on the part of plaintiffs to give correct, specific and exact description of the immovable property forming subject-matter of suit, added by omission on the part of the trial Court to insist on compliance by the draftsman of the plaint with the rules of pleadings, has resulted in a decree which is yet to witness its full execution and satisfaction though the litigation has by this time stretched over two decades.
(3.)The parties are appearing in person and we have heard them at length. We propose to make an order which would finally bury - to the extent we can - the hatches so far wielded by the parties. The directions which we propose to make, after briefly setting out the facts, are partly in exercise of jurisdiction conferred on this Court by Art. 142 of the Constitution of India for doing complete justice in the lis before us.


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.